EFV vs IQLT overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFV and IQLT share 31.3% of their weight across 117 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFV and IQLT
31.3%
117 shared positions
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 382 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 20.8%·Holdings of EFV
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 279 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 25.0%·Holdings of IQLT
Reported positions cover EFV 98%, IQLT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IQLT vs EFV side by side
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
382
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.1% of its weight is in 265 names IQLT does not hold
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
279
stock positions reported to the SEC
57.1% of its weight is in 162 names EFV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFV has 10.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFV | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 382 | 279 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 20.8% | 25.0% |
| Largest position | HSBC 2.8% | ASML 6.0% |
| Held alone | 265 positions, 63.1% | 162 positions, 57.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFV | In IQLT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 2.57% | 2.27% | 2.27% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.27% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.99% |
| ALLIANZ SE | 1.52% | 2.49% | 1.52% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.40% |
| IBERDROLA, S.A. | 1.32% | 1.18% | 1.18% |
| RIORIO TINTO LIMITED | 1.40% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| ZURICH INSURANCE GROUP AG | 0.89% | 1.61% | 0.89% |
| GSKGSK PLC | 0.93% | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| ULUNILEVER PLC | 0.72% | 1.17% | 0.72% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFV
Only in IQLT
Questions people ask
Is EFV the same as IQLT?
31.3% of their weight sits in the same 117 holdings. EFV also reports HSBC, MUFG, SMFG, which the other does not. IQLT also reports ASML, NVS, ABB LTD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFV and IQLT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EFV and 99% of IQLT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IQLT or EFV?
EFV reports 382 stock positions and IQLT reports 279. 63.1% of EFV's weight sits in names IQLT does not hold, and 57.1% of IQLT's weight in names EFV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 20.8% of EFV and 25.0% of IQLT.
How do EFV and IQLT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFV has 10.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.