EFV vs IQLT overlap - what they share and where they differ
EFV and IQLT share 34.3% of their weight across 124 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EFV and IQLT
34.3%
124 shared positions
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 374 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.4%·Holdings of EFV
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 281 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 22.7%·Holdings of IQLT
Reported positions cover EFV 99%, IQLT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IQLT vs EFV side by side
EFViShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
374
stock positions reported to the SEC
60.9% of its weight is in 250 names IQLT does not hold
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
281
stock positions reported to the SEC
52.9% of its weight is in 157 names EFV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFV has 10.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EFV | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 374 | 281 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 20.4% | 22.7% |
| Largest position | HSBC 3.2% | ASML 5.4% |
| Held alone | 250 positions, 60.9% | 157 positions, 52.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EFV | In IQLT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.84% | 2.30% | 1.84% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 2.29% | 1.81% | 1.81% |
| ALLIANZ SE | 1.68% | 2.68% | 1.68% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.66% | 1.78% | 1.66% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 2.28% | 1.59% | 1.59% |
| TTETOTALENERGIES SE | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.32% |
| IBERDROLA, S.A. | 1.31% | 1.32% | 1.31% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 1.24% | 1.49% | 1.24% |
| ULUNILEVER PLC | 1.24% | 1.34% | 1.24% |
| RIORIO TINTO LIMITED | 1.31% | 1.01% | 1.01% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EFV
Only in IQLT
Questions people ask
Is EFV the same as IQLT?
34.3% of their weight sits in the same 124 holdings. EFV also reports HSBC, MUFG, TM, which the other does not. IQLT also reports ASML, ABB LTD, AZN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EFV and IQLT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of EFV and 99% of IQLT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IQLT or EFV?
EFV reports 374 stock positions and IQLT reports 281. 60.9% of EFV's weight sits in names IQLT does not hold, and 52.9% of IQLT's weight in names EFV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 20.4% of EFV and 22.7% of IQLT.
How do EFV and IQLT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: EFV has 10.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.