EMXC vs FLKR overlap - what they share and where they differ

EMXC and FLKR share 25.2% of their weight across 70 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

EMXC and FLKR

25.2%

70 shared positions

EMXC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 561 positions · Aug 31, 2026

Top 10: 43.1%·Holdings of EMXC

FLKR

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF

Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 141 positions · Jun 30, 2026

Top 10: 63.8%·Holdings of FLKR

Reported positions cover EMXC 98%, FLKR 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

FLKR vs EMXC side by side

EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

561

stock positions reported to the SEC

72.5% of its weight is in 491 names FLKR does not hold

FLKRFranklin FTSE South Korea ETF

141

stock positions reported to the SEC

10.6% of its weight is in 71 names EMXC does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

EMXC
FLKR
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Technology
28.0%
27.5%
Financial Services
5.2%
4.3%
Basic Materials
2.0%
1.0%
Consumer Cyclical
1.0%
0.0%
Energy
0.8%
0.0%
Communication Services
0.0%
0.7%

The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: EMXC has 1.0 points more of it.

The figures side by side

EMXCFLKR
Filing dateAug 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026
Stock positions reported561141
Weight of the ten largest43.1%63.8%
Largest positionTSM 18.9%SKHY 27.4%
Held alone491 positions, 72.5%71 positions, 10.6%
Covered by stock positions98%97%

Holdings they share

StockIn EMXCIn FLKRCounted
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.10.12%18.00%10.12%
SKHYSK hynix Inc.6.83%27.39%6.83%
SK SQUARE CO., LTD.0.70%4.30%0.70%
KBKB Financial Group Inc.0.45%2.01%0.45%
HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY0.40%2.46%0.40%
SHGShinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.0.34%1.50%0.34%
HANA FINANCIAL GROUP INCHana Financial Group Inc.0.28%1.12%0.28%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO., LTD.0.27%1.42%0.27%
HANWHA AEROSPACE CO., LTD.0.27%1.19%0.27%
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.0.26%1.06%0.26%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in EMXC

TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited18.92%
MEDIATEK INC.1.82%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.1.15%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.0.98%
HDBHDFC BANK LIMITED0.87%
IBNICICI BANK LIMITED0.83%
RSRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED0.82%
PBRPetroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras)0.75%
ASXASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.0.63%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD0.60%

Only in FLKR

SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS4.17%
LG CHEMICAL LTD0.48%
LG INNOTEK CO LTDLG INNOTEK COMPANY LTD0.31%
SAMSUNG E&A CO LTD0.28%
SAMSUNG SECURITIES CO LTDSAMSUNG SECURITIES COMPANY LTD0.25%
LS CORP0.23%
KOREA ZINC CO LTDKOREA ZINC COMPANY LTD0.19%
COWAY CO LTD0.17%
SAM YANG FOODS COMPANY LTD0.17%
ABL BIO INC0.16%

Questions people ask

Is EMXC the same as FLKR?

25.2% of their weight sits in the same 70 holdings. EMXC also reports TSM, MEDIATEK INC., DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC., which the other does not. FLKR also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS, LG CHEMICAL LTD, LG INNOTEK CO LTD, which the other does not.

How is the overlap between EMXC and FLKR measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EMXC and 97% of FLKR, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, FLKR or EMXC?

EMXC reports 561 stock positions and FLKR reports 141. 72.5% of EMXC's weight sits in names FLKR does not hold, and 10.6% of FLKR's weight in names EMXC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 43.1% of EMXC and 63.8% of FLKR.

How do EMXC and FLKR differ by sector?

The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: EMXC has 1.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.