EMXC vs FLTW overlap - what they share and where they differ

EMXC and FLTW share 20.6% of their weight across 17 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

EMXC and FLTW

20.6%

17 shared positions

EMXC

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 582 positions · May 31, 2026

Top 10: 45.0%·Holdings of EMXC

FLTW

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF

Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 132 positions · Jun 30, 2026

Top 10: 54.1%·Holdings of FLTW

Reported positions cover EMXC 98%, FLTW 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

FLTW vs EMXC side by side

EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

582

stock positions reported to the SEC

76.9% of its weight is in 565 names FLTW does not hold

FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF

132

stock positions reported to the SEC

67.1% of its weight is in 115 names EMXC does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

EMXC
FLTW
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Technology
28.3%
26.4%
Financial Services
3.7%
0.9%
Basic Materials
2.1%
0.0%
Consumer Cyclical
1.0%
0.7%
Communication Services
0.0%
0.9%
Energy
0.8%
0.0%

The widest gap is Financial Services: EMXC has 2.8 points more of it.

The figures side by side

EMXCFLTW
Filing dateMay 31, 2026Jun 30, 2026
Stock positions reported582132
Weight of the ten largest45.0%54.1%
Largest positionTSM 17.9%TSM 19.8%
Held alone565 positions, 76.9%115 positions, 67.1%
Covered by stock positions98%100%

Holdings they share

StockIn EMXCIn FLTWCounted
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited17.94%19.84%17.94%
ASXASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.0.62%3.30%0.62%
UMCUnited Microelectronics Corporation0.50%2.81%0.50%
INTRInterconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P.0.30%0.25%0.25%
ASPEED TECHNOLOGY INC0.18%0.74%0.18%
CHTChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.0.16%0.79%0.16%
GLOBAL UNICHIP CORP0.12%0.57%0.12%
INHDInnolux Corporation0.12%0.74%0.12%
LARGAN PRECISION CO LTD0.11%0.59%0.11%
ALCHIP TECHNOLOGIES LTD0.10%0.48%0.10%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in EMXC

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.10.82%
SKHYSK hynix Inc.8.35%
MEDIATEK INC.2.04%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC.1.47%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.1.13%
HDBHDFC BANK LIMITED0.87%
RSRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED0.83%
SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO.,LTD0.78%
SK SQUARE CO., LTD.0.75%
PBRPetroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras)0.72%

Only in FLTW

MEDIATEK INC9.14%
DELTA ELECTRONICS INC5.51%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY COMPANY LTD4.48%
YAGEO CORP2.62%
ELITE MATERIAL COMPANY LTD2.48%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP2.07%
CTBC FINANCIAL HOLDING CO LTD1.84%
ACCTON TECHNOLOGY CORP1.81%
FUBON FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY LTD1.58%
QUANTA COMPUTER INC1.42%

Questions people ask

Is EMXC the same as FLTW?

20.6% of their weight sits in the same 17 holdings. EMXC also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, MEDIATEK INC., which the other does not. FLTW also reports MEDIATEK INC, DELTA ELECTRONICS INC, HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY COMPANY LTD, which the other does not.

How is the overlap between EMXC and FLTW measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of EMXC and 100% of FLTW, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, FLTW or EMXC?

EMXC reports 582 stock positions and FLTW reports 132. 76.9% of EMXC's weight sits in names FLTW does not hold, and 67.1% of FLTW's weight in names EMXC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 45.0% of EMXC and 54.1% of FLTW.

How do EMXC and FLTW differ by sector?

The widest gap is Financial Services: EMXC has 2.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.