ESGE vs MCHI overlap - what they share and where they differ
ESGE and MCHI share 18.8% of their weight across 72 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
ESGE and MCHI
18.8%
72 shared positions
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 257 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 40.2%·Holdings of ESGE
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 515 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 41.3%·Holdings of MCHI
Reported positions cover ESGE 97%, MCHI 96% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MCHI vs ESGE side by side
ESGEiShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
257
stock positions reported to the SEC
76.9% of its weight is in 185 names MCHI does not hold
MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF
515
stock positions reported to the SEC
33.6% of its weight is in 443 names ESGE does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: ESGE has 9.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| ESGE | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 257 | 515 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 40.2% | 41.3% |
| Largest position | TSM 14.9% | TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 13.2% |
| Held alone | 185 positions, 76.9% | 443 positions, 33.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 97% | 96% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In ESGE | In MCHI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 2.64% | 13.21% | 2.64% |
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.96% | 10.14% | 1.96% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 1.34% | 4.04% | 1.34% |
| LENOVO GROUP LIMITED | 0.90% | 0.94% | 0.90% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA, LTD. | 0.77% | 2.15% | 0.77% |
| CHINA MERCHANTS BANK CO., LTD. | 0.55% | 1.17% | 0.55% |
| BYD COMPANY LIMITED | 0.49% | 1.81% | 0.49% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.49% |
| NTESNETEASE, INC. | 0.43% | 1.63% | 0.43% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 0.41% | 2.25% | 0.41% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in ESGE
Only in MCHI
Questions people ask
Is ESGE the same as MCHI?
18.8% of their weight sits in the same 72 holdings. ESGE also reports TSM, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, which the other does not. MCHI also reports BANK OF CHINA LIMITED, PETROCHINA COMPANY LIMITED, ZIJIN MINING GROUP COMPANY LIMITED, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between ESGE and MCHI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of ESGE and 96% of MCHI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MCHI or ESGE?
ESGE reports 257 stock positions and MCHI reports 515. 76.9% of ESGE's weight sits in names MCHI does not hold, and 33.6% of MCHI's weight in names ESGE does not hold. The ten largest positions are 40.2% of ESGE and 41.3% of MCHI.
How do ESGE and MCHI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: ESGE has 9.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.