EWA vs URA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWA and URA share 2.2% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWA and URA
2.2%
1 shared positions
EWA
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Reported positions cover 91% of the fund, 40 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 64.1%·Holdings of EWA
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 52 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 66.1%·Holdings of URA
Reported positions cover EWA 91%, URA 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
URA vs EWA side by side
EWAiShares MSCI Australia ETF
40
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.5% of its weight is in 39 names URA does not hold
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
52
stock positions reported to the SEC
97.8% of its weight is in 51 names EWA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 31.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWA | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 40 | 52 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 64.1% | 66.1% |
| Largest position | BHP 15.7% | CCJ 23.1% |
| Held alone | 39 positions, 75.5% | 51 positions, 97.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 91% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWA | In URA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 15.69% | 2.21% | 2.21% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWA
Only in URA
Questions people ask
Is EWA the same as URA?
2.2% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. EWA also reports COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION, NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED, which the other does not. URA also reports CCJ, OKLO, NXE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWA and URA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 91% of EWA and 100% of URA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, URA or EWA?
EWA reports 40 stock positions and URA reports 52. 75.5% of EWA's weight sits in names URA does not hold, and 97.8% of URA's weight in names EWA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 64.1% of EWA and 66.1% of URA.
How do EWA and URA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 31.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.