EWA vs VPL overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWA and VPL share 11.8% of their weight across 39 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWA and VPL
11.8%
39 shared positions
EWA
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
Reported positions cover 92% of the fund, 41 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.9%·Holdings of EWA
VPL
VANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 2,168 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 25.7%·Holdings of VPL
Reported positions cover EWA 92%, VPL 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VPL vs EWA side by side
EWAiShares MSCI Australia ETF
41
stock positions reported to the SEC
1.0% of its weight is in 2 names VPL does not hold
VPLVANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
2,168
stock positions reported to the SEC
86.2% of its weight is in 2,129 names EWA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: EWA has 16.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWA | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 41 | 2,168 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 63.9% | 25.7% |
| Largest position | BHP 15.9% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 6.6% |
| Held alone | 2 positions, 1.0% | 2,129 positions, 86.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 92% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWA | In VPL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 15.91% | 1.77% | 1.77% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 12.74% | 1.72% | 1.72% |
| SUGPSUNCORP GROUP LIMITED | 0.97% | 1.49% | 0.97% |
| WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION | 5.63% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED | 5.64% | 0.73% | 0.73% |
| ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED | 5.34% | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| WESFARMERS LIMITED | 4.30% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
| MACQUARIE GROUP LIMITED | 4.32% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
| RIORIO TINTO LIMITED | 3.09% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
| WDSWOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP LTD | 2.95% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWA
Only in VPL
Questions people ask
Is EWA the same as VPL?
11.8% of their weight sits in the same 39 holdings. EWA also reports MEDIBANK PRIVATE LIMITED, SGH LIMITED, which the other does not. VPL also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, MUFG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWA and VPL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 92% of EWA and 99% of VPL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VPL or EWA?
EWA reports 41 stock positions and VPL reports 2,168. 1.0% of EWA's weight sits in names VPL does not hold, and 86.2% of VPL's weight in names EWA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 63.9% of EWA and 25.7% of VPL.
How do EWA and VPL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: EWA has 16.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.