EWC vs RING overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWC and RING share 11.2% of their weight across 9 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWC and RING
11.2%
9 shared positions
EWC
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 83 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 44.1%·Holdings of EWC
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 101% of the fund, 39 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 69.6%·Holdings of RING
Reported positions cover EWC 100%, RING 101% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
RING vs EWC side by side
EWCiShares MSCI Canada ETF
83
stock positions reported to the SEC
88.5% of its weight is in 74 names RING does not hold
RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
39
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.6% of its weight is in 30 names EWC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: RING has 67.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWC | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 83 | 39 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 44.1% | 69.6% |
| Largest position | RY 9.0% | NEM 17.2% |
| Held alone | 74 positions, 88.5% | 30 positions, 56.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 101% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWC | In RING | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEMAGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED | 3.24% | 12.84% | 3.24% |
| BBARRICK MINING CORPORATION | 2.36% | 8.79% | 2.36% |
| WPMWheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 2.15% | 7.68% | 2.15% |
| KGCKINROSS GOLD CORPORATION | 1.15% | 4.38% | 1.15% |
| PAASPan American Silver Corp. | 0.69% | 3.06% | 0.69% |
| AGIALAMOS GOLD INC. | 0.48% | 2.50% | 0.48% |
| EMAEMERA INCORPORATED | 0.48% | 0.70% | 0.48% |
| EQXEquinox Gold Corp. | 0.44% | 2.50% | 0.44% |
| LUNDIN GOLD INC. | 0.22% | 1.45% | 0.22% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWC
Only in RING
Questions people ask
Is EWC the same as RING?
11.2% of their weight sits in the same 9 holdings. EWC also reports RY, TD, SHOP, which the other does not. RING also reports NEM, AU, GFI, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWC and RING measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of EWC and 101% of RING, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, RING or EWC?
EWC reports 83 stock positions and RING reports 39. 88.5% of EWC's weight sits in names RING does not hold, and 56.6% of RING's weight in names EWC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 44.1% of EWC and 69.6% of RING.
How do EWC and RING differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: RING has 67.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.