EWJ vs URA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWJ and URA share 2.9% of their weight across 2 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWJ and URA
2.9%
2 shared positions
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 153 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 32.6%·Holdings of EWJ
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 57 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 63.0%·Holdings of URA
Reported positions cover EWJ 100%, URA 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
URA vs EWJ side by side
EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF
153
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.9% of its weight is in 151 names URA does not hold
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
57
stock positions reported to the SEC
95.3% of its weight is in 55 names EWJ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 54.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWJ | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 153 | 57 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 32.6% | 63.0% |
| Largest position | MUFG 6.3% | CCJ 22.2% |
| Held alone | 151 positions, 96.9% | 55 positions, 95.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWJ | In URA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTDMitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 1.47% | 2.04% | 1.47% |
| ITOCHU CORPORATION | 1.39% | 2.11% | 1.39% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWJ
Only in URA
Questions people ask
Is EWJ the same as URA?
2.9% of their weight sits in the same 2 holdings. EWJ also reports MUFG, TM, NODK, which the other does not. URA also reports CCJ, SII, OKLO, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWJ and URA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of EWJ and 99% of URA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, URA or EWJ?
EWJ reports 153 stock positions and URA reports 57. 96.9% of EWJ's weight sits in names URA does not hold, and 95.3% of URA's weight in names EWJ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.6% of EWJ and 63.0% of URA.
How do EWJ and URA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 54.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
EWJ against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.