EWJ vs URA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWJ and URA share 2.8% of their weight across 2 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWJ and URA
2.8%
2 shared positions
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 166 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 32.1%·Holdings of EWJ
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 52 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 66.1%·Holdings of URA
Reported positions cover EWJ 99%, URA 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
URA vs EWJ side by side
EWJiShares MSCI Japan ETF
166
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.2% of its weight is in 164 names URA does not hold
URAGlobal X Uranium ETF
52
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.4% of its weight is in 50 names EWJ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 50.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWJ | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 166 | 52 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 32.1% | 66.1% |
| Largest position | MUFG 6.0% | CCJ 23.1% |
| Held alone | 164 positions, 96.2% | 50 positions, 96.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWJ | In URA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. | 1.45% | 1.84% | 1.45% |
| ITOCHU CORPORATION | 1.37% | 1.77% | 1.37% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWJ
Only in URA
Questions people ask
Is EWJ the same as URA?
2.8% of their weight sits in the same 2 holdings. EWJ also reports MUFG, SMFG, TM, which the other does not. URA also reports CCJ, OKLO, NXE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWJ and URA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of EWJ and 100% of URA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, URA or EWJ?
EWJ reports 166 stock positions and URA reports 52. 96.2% of EWJ's weight sits in names URA does not hold, and 96.4% of URA's weight in names EWJ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 32.1% of EWJ and 66.1% of URA.
How do EWJ and URA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: URA has 50.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.