EWU vs IEFA overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWU and IEFA share 12.9% of their weight across 70 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWU and IEFA
12.9%
70 shared positions
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 71 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 52.4%·Holdings of EWU
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,568 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 12.0%·Holdings of IEFA
Reported positions cover EWU 99%, IEFA 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IEFA vs EWU side by side
EWUiShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
71
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.3% of its weight is in 1 names IEFA does not hold
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
1,568
stock positions reported to the SEC
83.8% of its weight is in 1,498 names EWU does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: EWU has 10.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWU | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 71 | 1,568 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 52.4% | 12.0% |
| Largest position | HSBC 10.1% | ASML 2.2% |
| Held alone | 1 positions, 0.3% | 1,498 positions, 83.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 97% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWU | In IEFA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBCHSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 10.06% | 1.24% | 1.24% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 8.98% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 7.51% | 1.02% | 1.02% |
| RIORIO TINTO PLC | 3.74% | 0.63% | 0.63% |
| ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC | 4.71% | 0.53% | 0.53% |
| BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO P.L.C. | 4.20% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| ULUNILEVER PLC | 3.83% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| BPBP P.L.C. | 3.47% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| GSKGSK PLC | 3.21% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| NGGNATIONAL GRID PLC | 2.49% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWU
Only in IEFA
Questions people ask
Is EWU the same as IEFA?
12.9% of their weight sits in the same 70 holdings. EWU also reports WISE GROUP PLC, which the other does not. IEFA also reports ASML, MUFG, ROCHE HOLDING AG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWU and IEFA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of EWU and 97% of IEFA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IEFA or EWU?
EWU reports 71 stock positions and IEFA reports 1,568. 0.3% of EWU's weight sits in names IEFA does not hold, and 83.8% of IEFA's weight in names EWU does not hold. The ten largest positions are 52.4% of EWU and 12.0% of IEFA.
How do EWU and IEFA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: EWU has 10.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IEFA against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.