EWW vs GDXJ overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWW and GDXJ share 2.9% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWW and GDXJ
2.9%
1 shared positions
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
Reported positions cover 89% of the fund, 37 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 57.9%·Holdings of EWW
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 114 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 42.7%·Holdings of GDXJ
Reported positions cover EWW 89%, GDXJ 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
GDXJ vs EWW side by side
EWWiShares MSCI Mexico ETF
37
stock positions reported to the SEC
84.7% of its weight is in 36 names GDXJ does not hold
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
114
stock positions reported to the SEC
97.0% of its weight is in 113 names EWW does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: GDXJ has 45.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWW | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 37 | 114 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 57.9% | 42.7% |
| Largest position | GRUPO MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V. 16.6% | EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED 6.4% |
| Held alone | 36 positions, 84.7% | 113 positions, 97.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 89% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWW | In GDXJ | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V. | 4.32% | 2.88% | 2.88% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWW
Only in GDXJ
Questions people ask
Is EWW the same as GDXJ?
2.9% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. EWW also reports GRUPO MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V., GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V., AMX, which the other does not. GDXJ also reports EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED, EQX, AGI, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWW and GDXJ measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 89% of EWW and 100% of GDXJ, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, GDXJ or EWW?
EWW reports 37 stock positions and GDXJ reports 114. 84.7% of EWW's weight sits in names GDXJ does not hold, and 97.0% of GDXJ's weight in names EWW does not hold. The ten largest positions are 57.9% of EWW and 42.7% of GDXJ.
How do EWW and GDXJ differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: GDXJ has 45.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.