EWW vs PICK overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWW and PICK share 2.3% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWW and PICK
2.3%
1 shared positions
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
Reported positions cover 89% of the fund, 37 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 57.9%·Holdings of EWW
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 235 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 49.4%·Holdings of PICK
Reported positions cover EWW 89%, PICK 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
PICK vs EWW side by side
EWWiShares MSCI Mexico ETF
37
stock positions reported to the SEC
72.4% of its weight is in 36 names PICK does not hold
PICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
235
stock positions reported to the SEC
96.6% of its weight is in 234 names EWW does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 40.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWW | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Aug 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 37 | 235 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 57.9% | 49.4% |
| Largest position | GRUPO MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V. 16.6% | BHP 13.8% |
| Held alone | 36 positions, 72.4% | 234 positions, 96.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 89% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWW | In PICK | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRUPO MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V. | 16.61% | 2.33% | 2.33% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWW
Only in PICK
Questions people ask
Is EWW the same as PICK?
2.3% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. EWW also reports GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V., AMX, INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V., which the other does not. PICK also reports BHP, RIO, FCX, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWW and PICK measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 89% of EWW and 99% of PICK, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, PICK or EWW?
EWW reports 37 stock positions and PICK reports 235. 72.4% of EWW's weight sits in names PICK does not hold, and 96.6% of PICK's weight in names EWW does not hold. The ten largest positions are 57.9% of EWW and 49.4% of PICK.
How do EWW and PICK differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 40.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.