EWW vs SIL overlap - what they share and where they differ
EWW and SIL share 4.5% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
EWW and SIL
4.5%
1 shared positions
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
Reported positions cover 90% of the fund, 38 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 58.2%·Holdings of EWW
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 38 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 75.1%·Holdings of SIL
Reported positions cover EWW 90%, SIL 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SIL vs EWW side by side
EWWiShares MSCI Mexico ETF
38
stock positions reported to the SEC
85.7% of its weight is in 37 names SIL does not hold
SILGlobal X Silver Miners ETF
38
stock positions reported to the SEC
95.0% of its weight is in 37 names EWW does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: SIL has 63.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| EWW | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 38 | 38 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.2% | 75.1% |
| Largest position | GRUPO MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V. 14.3% | WPM 22.3% |
| Held alone | 37 positions, 85.7% | 37 positions, 95.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 90% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In EWW | In SIL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V. | 4.63% | 4.54% | 4.54% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in EWW
Only in SIL
Questions people ask
Is EWW the same as SIL?
4.5% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. EWW also reports GRUPO MEXICO, S.A.B. DE C.V., GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE, S.A.B. DE C.V., AMX, which the other does not. SIL also reports WPM, PAAS, CDE, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between EWW and SIL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 90% of EWW and 100% of SIL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SIL or EWW?
EWW reports 38 stock positions and SIL reports 38. 85.7% of EWW's weight sits in names SIL does not hold, and 95.0% of SIL's weight in names EWW does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.2% of EWW and 75.1% of SIL.
How do EWW and SIL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: SIL has 63.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.