FBCG vs IVW overlap - what they share and where they differ
FBCG and IVW share 60.9% of their weight across 63 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FBCG and IVW
60.9%
63 shared positions
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 196 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 61.0%·Holdings of FBCG
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 145 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.0%·Holdings of IVW
Reported positions cover FBCG 100%, IVW 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IVW vs FBCG side by side
FBCGFidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
196
stock positions reported to the SEC
20.8% of its weight is in 133 names IVW does not hold
IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
145
stock positions reported to the SEC
19.6% of its weight is in 82 names FBCG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: IVW has 8.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FBCG | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 196 | 145 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 61.0% | 59.0% |
| Largest position | NVDA 14.6% | NVDA 13.7% |
| Held alone | 133 positions, 20.8% | 82 positions, 19.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FBCG | In IVW | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 14.58% | 13.65% | 13.65% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 9.08% | 10.60% | 9.08% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 9.61% | 5.98% | 5.98% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 5.19% | 7.80% | 5.19% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 3.73% | 5.04% | 3.73% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 8.40% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.89% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| LLYELI LILLY and CO | 2.25% | 2.67% | 2.25% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 1.45% | 2.07% | 1.45% |
| NFLXNETFLIX INC | 2.22% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FBCG
Only in IVW
Questions people ask
Is FBCG the same as IVW?
60.9% of their weight sits in the same 63 holdings. FBCG also reports WDC, TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD, CLS, which the other does not. IVW also reports BRK.A, JPM, AMAT, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FBCG and IVW measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of FBCG and 100% of IVW, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IVW or FBCG?
FBCG reports 196 stock positions and IVW reports 145. 20.8% of FBCG's weight sits in names IVW does not hold, and 19.6% of IVW's weight in names FBCG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 61.0% of FBCG and 59.0% of IVW.
How do FBCG and IVW differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: IVW has 8.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVW against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.