FELC vs MOAT overlap - what they share and where they differ
FELC and MOAT share 15.0% of their weight across 14 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FELC and MOAT
15.0%
14 shared positions
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 209 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 39.9%·Holdings of FELC
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 55 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 25.3%·Holdings of MOAT
Reported positions cover FELC 99%, MOAT 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MOAT vs FELC side by side
FELCFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
209
stock positions reported to the SEC
72.1% of its weight is in 195 names MOAT does not hold
MOATVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
55
stock positions reported to the SEC
73.4% of its weight is in 41 names FELC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: MOAT has 16.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FELC | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 209 | 55 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 39.9% | 25.3% |
| Largest position | NVDA 8.0% | MAS 3.0% |
| Held alone | 195 positions, 72.1% | 41 positions, 73.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FELC | In MOAT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 7.95% | 2.45% | 2.45% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 3.19% | 2.43% | 2.43% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 4.03% | 2.20% | 2.20% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.89% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.18% | 2.34% | 1.18% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 2.19% | 1.17% | 1.17% |
| APHAMPHENOL CORPORATION NEW | 0.92% | 1.50% | 0.92% |
| BMYBRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO | 0.71% | 2.43% | 0.71% |
| FTNTFORTINET INC | 0.71% | 2.21% | 0.71% |
| ABNBAIRBNB INC | 0.62% | 2.56% | 0.62% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FELC
Only in MOAT
Questions people ask
Is FELC the same as MOAT?
15.0% of their weight sits in the same 14 holdings. FELC also reports AAPL, GOOGL, MU, which the other does not. MOAT also reports MAS, KVUE, PANW, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FELC and MOAT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of FELC and 100% of MOAT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MOAT or FELC?
FELC reports 209 stock positions and MOAT reports 55. 72.1% of FELC's weight sits in names MOAT does not hold, and 73.4% of MOAT's weight in names FELC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 39.9% of FELC and 25.3% of MOAT.
How do FELC and MOAT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: MOAT has 16.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.