FLJP vs IEFA overlap - what they share and where they differ
FLJP and IEFA share 23.5% of their weight across 413 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FLJP and IEFA
23.5%
413 shared positions
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 427 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 28.4%·Holdings of FLJP
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 2,405 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 12.5%·Holdings of IEFA
Reported positions cover FLJP 100%, IEFA 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IEFA vs FLJP side by side
FLJPFranklin FTSE Japan ETF
427
stock positions reported to the SEC
1.8% of its weight is in 14 names IEFA does not hold
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
2,405
stock positions reported to the SEC
73.9% of its weight is in 1,992 names FLJP does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: IEFA has 3.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FLJP | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 427 | 2,405 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 28.4% | 12.5% |
| Largest position | MUFG 4.8% | ASML 2.5% |
| Held alone | 14 positions, 1.8% | 1,992 positions, 73.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FLJP | In IEFA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUFGMITSUBISHI CORP | 4.83% | 1.28% | 1.28% |
| NODKNIPPON TELEVISION HOLDINGS INC | 3.17% | 0.94% | 0.94% |
| SUGPSUZUKEN COMPANY LTD | 2.37% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| TMTOYOTA MOTOR CORP | 2.89% | 0.70% | 0.70% |
| SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP INC | 2.27% | 0.61% | 0.61% |
| TOKYO ELECTRON LIMITEDTOKYO ELECTRON LTD | 3.37% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
| ADVANTEST CORP | 2.33% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
| HITACHI LTD | 1.96% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
| SONYSONY GROUP CORP | 1.92% | 0.53% | 0.53% |
| MFGMIZUHO FINANCIAL GROUP INC | 1.81% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FLJP
Only in IEFA
Questions people ask
Is FLJP the same as IEFA?
23.5% of their weight sits in the same 413 holdings. FLJP also reports AJINOMOTO (JAPAN) COMPANY INC, SMC CORP (JP), OSAKA GAS CO LTD (OSAKA GAS KABUSHIKI KAISHA), which the other does not. IEFA also reports ASML, HSBC, ROCHE HOLDING AG, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FLJP and IEFA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of FLJP and 98% of IEFA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IEFA or FLJP?
FLJP reports 427 stock positions and IEFA reports 2,405. 1.8% of FLJP's weight sits in names IEFA does not hold, and 73.9% of IEFA's weight in names FLJP does not hold. The ten largest positions are 28.4% of FLJP and 12.5% of IEFA.
How do FLJP and IEFA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: IEFA has 3.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.