FNDF vs PICK overlap - what they share and where they differ
FNDF and PICK share 8.6% of their weight across 33 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FNDF and PICK
8.6%
33 shared positions
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 819 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 17.7%·Holdings of FNDF
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 235 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 49.4%·Holdings of PICK
Reported positions cover FNDF 98%, PICK 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
PICK vs FNDF side by side
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
819
stock positions reported to the SEC
89.0% of its weight is in 786 names PICK does not hold
PICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
235
stock positions reported to the SEC
47.5% of its weight is in 202 names FNDF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 40.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FNDF | PICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 819 | 235 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 17.7% | 49.4% |
| Largest position | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 5.5% | BHP 13.8% |
| Held alone | 786 positions, 89.0% | 202 positions, 47.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FNDF | In PICK | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHPBHP Group Ltd | 1.22% | 13.81% | 1.22% |
| GLENCORE PLC | 1.22% | 4.34% | 1.22% |
| RIORio Tinto Ltd | 1.13% | 9.02% | 1.13% |
| NODKNissin Foods Holdings Co Ltd | 1.04% | 1.37% | 1.04% |
| SUGPSuntory Beverage & Food Ltd | 1.21% | 1.01% | 1.01% |
| ANGLO AMERICAN PLC | 0.42% | 3.48% | 0.42% |
| ARCELORMITTAL SA | 0.40% | 1.84% | 0.40% |
| PKXPOSCO Holdings Inc | 0.34% | 1.02% | 0.34% |
| FORTESCUE LTD | 0.18% | 1.19% | 0.18% |
| TECKTeck Resources Ltd | 0.17% | 1.80% | 0.17% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FNDF
Only in PICK
Questions people ask
Is FNDF the same as PICK?
8.6% of their weight sits in the same 33 holdings. FNDF also reports SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHEL, TTE, which the other does not. PICK also reports FCX, NUE, VALE S.A., which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FNDF and PICK measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of FNDF and 99% of PICK, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, PICK or FNDF?
FNDF reports 819 stock positions and PICK reports 235. 89.0% of FNDF's weight sits in names PICK does not hold, and 47.5% of PICK's weight in names FNDF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 17.7% of FNDF and 49.4% of PICK.
How do FNDF and PICK differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: PICK has 40.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.