FNDF vs VPL overlap - what they share and where they differ
FNDF and VPL share 36.7% of their weight across 352 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FNDF and VPL
36.7%
352 shared positions
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 835 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 17.5%·Holdings of FNDF
VPL
VANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,355 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 23.7%·Holdings of VPL
Reported positions cover FNDF 98%, VPL 97% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VPL vs FNDF side by side
FNDFSchwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
835
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.5% of its weight is in 483 names VPL does not hold
VPLVANGUARD PACIFIC STOCK INDEX FUND
1,355
stock positions reported to the SEC
23.1% of its weight is in 1,003 names FNDF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Energy: FNDF has 7.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FNDF | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 835 | 1,355 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 17.5% | 23.7% |
| Largest position | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 5.5% | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 6.0% |
| Held alone | 483 positions, 56.5% | 1,003 positions, 23.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 97% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FNDF | In VPL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 5.52% | 6.00% | 5.52% |
| SKHYSK hynix Inc | 1.37% | 4.08% | 1.37% |
| BHPBHP Group Ltd | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.22% |
| NODKNippon Sanso Holdings Corp | 1.03% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
| MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc | 0.94% | 2.56% | 0.94% |
| TMToyota Motor Corp | 0.89% | 1.73% | 0.89% |
| SMFGSumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Inc | 0.64% | 1.59% | 0.64% |
| MITSUI & CO LTD | 0.46% | 0.80% | 0.46% |
| MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
| HYUNDAI MOTOR CO | 0.50% | 0.41% | 0.41% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FNDF
Only in VPL
Questions people ask
Is FNDF the same as VPL?
36.7% of their weight sits in the same 352 holdings. FNDF also reports SHEL, TTE, GLENCORE PLC, which the other does not. VPL also reports ANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LTD, SK SQUARE CO LTD, DOOSAN ENERBILITY CO LTD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FNDF and VPL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of FNDF and 97% of VPL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VPL or FNDF?
FNDF reports 835 stock positions and VPL reports 1,355. 56.5% of FNDF's weight sits in names VPL does not hold, and 23.1% of VPL's weight in names FNDF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 17.5% of FNDF and 23.7% of VPL.
How do FNDF and VPL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Energy: FNDF has 7.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.