FTEC vs IGV overlap - what they share and where they differ
FTEC and IGV share 21.6% of their weight across 97 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FTEC and IGV
21.6%
97 shared positions
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 278 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 62.2%·Holdings of FTEC
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 107 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.7%·Holdings of IGV
Reported positions cover FTEC 100%, IGV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IGV vs FTEC side by side
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
278
stock positions reported to the SEC
75.3% of its weight is in 181 names IGV does not hold
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
107
stock positions reported to the SEC
4.7% of its weight is in 10 names FTEC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: FTEC has 1.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FTEC | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 278 | 107 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 62.2% | 60.7% |
| Largest position | NVDA 17.1% | PANW 10.4% |
| Held alone | 181 positions, 75.3% | 10 positions, 4.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FTEC | In IGV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.93% | 8.07% | 8.07% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc | 1.17% | 10.37% | 1.17% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.13% | 7.70% | 1.13% |
| ORCLOracle Corp | 0.90% | 6.26% | 0.90% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.83% | 7.28% | 0.83% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc | 0.65% | 4.81% | 0.65% |
| NOWServiceNow Inc | 0.49% | 3.87% | 0.49% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.48% | 3.62% | 0.48% |
| ADBEAdobe Inc | 0.46% | 3.13% | 0.46% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc | 0.42% | 3.91% | 0.42% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FTEC
Only in IGV
Questions people ask
Is FTEC the same as IGV?
21.6% of their weight sits in the same 97 holdings. FTEC also reports NVDA, AAPL, AVGO, which the other does not. IGV also reports ELECTRONIC ARTS INC, TTWO, BMNR, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FTEC and IGV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of FTEC and 100% of IGV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IGV or FTEC?
FTEC reports 278 stock positions and IGV reports 107. 75.3% of FTEC's weight sits in names IGV does not hold, and 4.7% of IGV's weight in names FTEC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 62.2% of FTEC and 60.7% of IGV.
How do FTEC and IGV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: FTEC has 1.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
FTEC against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.