FTEC vs IWF overlap - what they share and where they differ
FTEC and IWF share 52.5% of their weight across 93 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FTEC and IWF
52.5%
93 shared positions
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 278 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 62.2%·Holdings of FTEC
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 365 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.1%·Holdings of IWF
Reported positions cover FTEC 100%, IWF 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IWF vs FTEC side by side
FTECFidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
278
stock positions reported to the SEC
17.4% of its weight is in 185 names IWF does not hold
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
365
stock positions reported to the SEC
45.6% of its weight is in 272 names FTEC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: FTEC has 27.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FTEC | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 278 | 365 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 62.2% | 57.1% |
| Largest position | NVDA 17.1% | NVDA 13.8% |
| Held alone | 185 positions, 17.4% | 272 positions, 45.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FTEC | In IWF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 17.09% | 13.83% | 13.83% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 16.21% | 6.72% | 6.72% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.20% | 5.21% | 4.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.93% | 4.11% | 4.11% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 3.82% | 3.86% | 3.82% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.18% | 2.80% | 2.80% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 1.69% | 1.70% | 1.69% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
| KLACKLA Corp | 1.03% | 1.17% | 1.03% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc | 1.17% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FTEC
Only in IWF
Questions people ask
Is FTEC the same as IWF?
52.5% of their weight sits in the same 93 holdings. FTEC also reports CSCO, INTC, IBM, which the other does not. IWF also reports GOOGL, TSLA, META, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FTEC and IWF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of FTEC and 100% of IWF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IWF or FTEC?
FTEC reports 278 stock positions and IWF reports 365. 17.4% of FTEC's weight sits in names IWF does not hold, and 45.6% of IWF's weight in names FTEC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 62.2% of FTEC and 57.1% of IWF.
How do FTEC and IWF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: FTEC has 27.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
FTEC against other funds in the table
IWF against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.