FXI vs MCHI overlap - what they share and where they differ
FXI and MCHI share 58.8% of their weight across 50 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
FXI and MCHI
58.8%
50 shared positions
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 50 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 58.5%·Holdings of FXI
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 500 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 42.0%·Holdings of MCHI
Reported positions cover FXI 99%, MCHI 96% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MCHI vs FXI side by side
FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF
50
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.0% of its weight is in 0 names MCHI does not hold
MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF
500
stock positions reported to the SEC
32.5% of its weight is in 450 names FXI does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: FXI has 3.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| FXI | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 50 | 500 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.5% | 42.0% |
| Largest position | BABA 9.4% | TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 13.9% |
| Held alone | 0 positions, 0.0% | 450 positions, 32.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 99% | 96% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In FXI | In MCHI | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 9.36% | 9.42% | 9.36% |
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 8.93% | 13.93% | 8.93% |
| CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION | 8.85% | 4.08% | 4.08% |
| INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 6.16% | 2.64% | 2.64% |
| XIAOMI CORPORATION | 5.09% | 2.37% | 2.37% |
| BANK OF CHINA LIMITED | 3.78% | 2.07% | 2.07% |
| PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) COMPANY OF CHINA, LTD. | 3.85% | 2.05% | 2.05% |
| MEITUAN | 5.13% | 1.98% | 1.98% |
| BYD COMPANY LIMITED | 3.51% | 1.77% | 1.77% |
| NTESNETEASE, INC. | 3.85% | 1.68% | 1.68% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in FXI
Nothing among its reported positions that the others do not also hold.
Only in MCHI
Questions people ask
Is FXI the same as MCHI?
58.8% of their weight sits in the same 50 holdings. Among its reported positions, FXI holds nothing the other does not also hold. MCHI also reports LENOVO GROUP LIMITED, WUXI BIOLOGICS (CAYMAN) INC., INHD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between FXI and MCHI measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 99% of FXI and 96% of MCHI, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MCHI or FXI?
FXI reports 50 stock positions and MCHI reports 500. 0.0% of FXI's weight sits in names MCHI does not hold, and 32.5% of MCHI's weight in names FXI does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.5% of FXI and 42.0% of MCHI.
How do FXI and MCHI differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: FXI has 3.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.