GDXJ vs IYM overlap - what they share and where they differ
GDXJ and IYM share 2.8% of their weight across 3 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
GDXJ and IYM
2.8%
3 shared positions
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 114 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 42.7%·Holdings of GDXJ
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 39 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 67.5%·Holdings of IYM
Reported positions cover GDXJ 100%, IYM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IYM vs GDXJ side by side
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
114
stock positions reported to the SEC
91.3% of its weight is in 111 names IYM does not hold
IYMiShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
39
stock positions reported to the SEC
97.1% of its weight is in 36 names GDXJ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: IYM has 29.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| GDXJ | IYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 114 | 39 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 42.7% | 67.5% |
| Largest position | EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED 6.4% | LIN 20.4% |
| Held alone | 111 positions, 91.3% | 36 positions, 97.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In GDXJ | In IYM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDECoeur Mining Inc | 5.14% | 1.60% | 1.60% |
| HLHecla Mining Co | 2.63% | 0.93% | 0.93% |
| AUGOAura Minerals Inc | 0.86% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in GDXJ
Only in IYM
Questions people ask
Is GDXJ the same as IYM?
2.8% of their weight sits in the same 3 holdings. GDXJ also reports EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED, EQX, AGI, which the other does not. IYM also reports LIN, NEM, FCX, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between GDXJ and IYM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of GDXJ and 100% of IYM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IYM or GDXJ?
GDXJ reports 114 stock positions and IYM reports 39. 91.3% of GDXJ's weight sits in names IYM does not hold, and 97.1% of IYM's weight in names GDXJ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 42.7% of GDXJ and 67.5% of IYM.
How do GDXJ and IYM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: IYM has 29.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.