GDXJ vs RING overlap - what they share and where they differ
GDXJ and RING share 32.3% of their weight across 28 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
GDXJ and RING
32.3%
28 shared positions
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 114 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 42.7%·Holdings of GDXJ
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 101% of the fund, 39 positions · Aug 31, 2026
Top 10: 69.6%·Holdings of RING
Reported positions cover GDXJ 100%, RING 101% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
RING vs GDXJ side by side
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
114
stock positions reported to the SEC
51.3% of its weight is in 86 names RING does not hold
RINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
39
stock positions reported to the SEC
65.9% of its weight is in 11 names GDXJ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: RING has 33.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| GDXJ | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 114 | 39 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 42.7% | 69.6% |
| Largest position | EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED 6.4% | NEM 17.2% |
| Held alone | 86 positions, 51.3% | 11 positions, 65.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 101% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In GDXJ | In RING | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDECoeur Mining Inc | 5.14% | 3.45% | 3.45% |
| AGIAlamos Gold Inc | 6.23% | 2.50% | 2.50% |
| EQXEquinox Gold Corp | 6.28% | 2.50% | 2.50% |
| IAGIAMGOLD Corp | 2.62% | 2.13% | 2.13% |
| ENDEAVOUR MINING PLC | 5.33% | 2.05% | 2.05% |
| EGOEldorado Gold Corp | 2.49% | 1.92% | 1.92% |
| HMYHarmony Gold Mining Co Ltd | 2.05% | 1.91% | 1.91% |
| SSRMSSR Mining Inc | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.60% |
| LUNDIN GOLD INC.Lundin Gold Inc | 1.93% | 1.45% | 1.45% |
| BTGB2Gold Corp | 1.53% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in GDXJ
Only in RING
Questions people ask
Is GDXJ the same as RING?
32.3% of their weight sits in the same 28 holdings. GDXJ also reports EVOLUTION MINING LIMITED, INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V., AG, which the other does not. RING also reports NEM, AEM, B, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between GDXJ and RING measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of GDXJ and 101% of RING, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, RING or GDXJ?
GDXJ reports 114 stock positions and RING reports 39. 51.3% of GDXJ's weight sits in names RING does not hold, and 65.9% of RING's weight in names GDXJ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 42.7% of GDXJ and 69.6% of RING.
How do GDXJ and RING differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: RING has 33.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.