GDXJ vs XMMO overlap - what they share and where they differ
GDXJ and XMMO share 1.9% of their weight across 1 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
GDXJ and XMMO
1.9%
1 shared positions
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 112 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 42.7%·Holdings of GDXJ
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 76 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 27.9%·Holdings of XMMO
Reported positions cover GDXJ 100%, XMMO 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XMMO vs GDXJ side by side
GDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
112
stock positions reported to the SEC
97.3% of its weight is in 111 names XMMO does not hold
XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
76
stock positions reported to the SEC
97.7% of its weight is in 75 names GDXJ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: GDXJ has 34.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| GDXJ | XMMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 112 | 76 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 42.7% | 27.9% |
| Largest position | EVOLUTION MINING LTD 6.4% | CW 3.9% |
| Held alone | 111 positions, 97.3% | 75 positions, 97.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In GDXJ | In XMMO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLHecla Mining Co | 2.63% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in GDXJ
Only in XMMO
Questions people ask
Is GDXJ the same as XMMO?
1.9% of their weight sits in the same 1 holdings. GDXJ also reports EVOLUTION MINING LTD, EQX, AGI, which the other does not. XMMO also reports CW, FTI, FN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between GDXJ and XMMO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of GDXJ and 100% of XMMO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XMMO or GDXJ?
GDXJ reports 112 stock positions and XMMO reports 76. 97.3% of GDXJ's weight sits in names XMMO does not hold, and 97.7% of XMMO's weight in names GDXJ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 42.7% of GDXJ and 27.9% of XMMO.
How do GDXJ and XMMO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: GDXJ has 34.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.