GSLC vs QUAL overlap - what they share and where they differ
GSLC and QUAL share 43.6% of their weight across 96 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
GSLC and QUAL
43.6%
96 shared positions
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 433 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 37.3%·Holdings of GSLC
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 120 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 41.1%·Holdings of QUAL
Reported positions cover GSLC 100%, QUAL 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QUAL vs GSLC side by side
GSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
433
stock positions reported to the SEC
53.2% of its weight is in 337 names QUAL does not hold
QUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
120
stock positions reported to the SEC
6.5% of its weight is in 24 names GSLC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: GSLC has 2.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| GSLC | QUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 433 | 120 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 37.3% | 41.1% |
| Largest position | NVDA 7.9% | NVDA 6.5% |
| Held alone | 337 positions, 53.2% | 24 positions, 6.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In GSLC | In QUAL | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 7.87% | 6.50% | 6.50% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.00% | 6.27% | 6.27% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 4.87% | 5.04% | 4.87% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 5.20% | 4.64% | 4.64% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 2.14% | 3.49% | 2.14% |
| LLYELI LILLY & COMPANY | 1.17% | 2.92% | 1.17% |
| BRK.ABERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC | 0.85% | 2.11% | 0.85% |
| WMTWALMART INC | 0.84% | 1.23% | 0.84% |
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.73% | 1.92% | 0.73% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.71% | 3.22% | 0.71% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in GSLC
Only in QUAL
Questions people ask
Is GSLC the same as QUAL?
43.6% of their weight sits in the same 96 holdings. GSLC also reports AMZN, AVGO, TSLA, which the other does not. QUAL also reports CMG, LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between GSLC and QUAL measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of GSLC and 100% of QUAL, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QUAL or GSLC?
GSLC reports 433 stock positions and QUAL reports 120. 53.2% of GSLC's weight sits in names QUAL does not hold, and 6.5% of QUAL's weight in names GSLC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 37.3% of GSLC and 41.1% of QUAL.
How do GSLC and QUAL differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: GSLC has 2.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.