GSLC vs SCHB overlap - what they share and where they differ
GSLC and SCHB share 73.9% of their weight across 428 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
GSLC and SCHB
73.9%
428 shared positions
GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 433 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 37.2%·Holdings of GSLC
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 2,398 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 36.1%·Holdings of SCHB
Reported positions cover GSLC 100%, SCHB 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SCHB vs GSLC side by side
GSLCGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta(R) U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
433
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.6% of its weight is in 5 names SCHB does not hold
SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
2,398
stock positions reported to the SEC
13.5% of its weight is in 1,970 names GSLC does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: GSLC has 1.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| GSLC | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 433 | 2,398 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 37.2% | 36.1% |
| Largest position | NVDA 7.9% | NVDA 7.0% |
| Held alone | 5 positions, 0.6% | 1,970 positions, 13.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In GSLC | In SCHB | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 7.87% | 7.02% | 7.02% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.00% | 6.26% | 6.26% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 5.19% | 5.44% | 5.19% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 4.87% | 4.57% | 4.57% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.78% | 3.62% | 3.62% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.84% | 2.90% | 2.84% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 2.14% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.28% |
| LLYELI LILLY & COMPANY | 1.17% | 1.20% | 1.17% |
| JPMJP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 1.10% | 1.10% | 1.10% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in GSLC
Only in SCHB
Questions people ask
Is GSLC the same as SCHB?
73.9% of their weight sits in the same 428 holdings. GSLC also reports SNDK, UAL, AER, which the other does not. SCHB also reports GS, SANDISK CORP/DE, SPGI, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between GSLC and SCHB measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of GSLC and 100% of SCHB, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SCHB or GSLC?
GSLC reports 433 stock positions and SCHB reports 2,398. 0.6% of GSLC's weight sits in names SCHB does not hold, and 13.5% of SCHB's weight in names GSLC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 37.2% of GSLC and 36.1% of SCHB.
How do GSLC and SCHB differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: GSLC has 1.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
SCHB against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.