IDEV vs SCZ overlap - what they share and where they differ

IDEV and SCZ share 12.2% of their weight across 832 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

IDEV and SCZ

12.2%

832 shared positions

IDEV

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF

Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,653 positions · Apr 30, 2026

Top 10: 10.6%·Holdings of IDEV

SCZ

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

Reported positions cover 96% of the fund, 1,894 positions · Apr 30, 2026

Top 10: 5.8%·Holdings of SCZ

Reported positions cover IDEV 97%, SCZ 96% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

SCZ vs IDEV side by side

IDEViShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF

1,653

stock positions reported to the SEC

84.0% of its weight is in 821 names SCZ does not hold

SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

1,894

stock positions reported to the SEC

22.7% of its weight is in 1,062 names IDEV does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

IDEV
SCZ
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Financial Services
10.4%
3.1%
Technology
5.4%
1.3%
Healthcare
4.0%
0.6%
Basic Materials
3.7%
0.5%
Energy
3.4%
0.0%
Industrials
0.0%
1.2%

The widest gap is Financial Services: IDEV has 7.3 points more of it.

The figures side by side

IDEVSCZ
Filing dateApr 30, 2026Apr 30, 2026
Stock positions reported1,6531,894
Weight of the ten largest10.6%5.8%
Largest positionASML 1.9%NODK 2.5%
Held alone821 positions, 84.0%1,062 positions, 22.7%
Covered by stock positions97%96%

Holdings they share

StockIn IDEVIn SCZCounted
NODKNIPPON REIT Investment Corporation0.82%2.47%0.82%
SAPSAPPORO HOLDINGS LIMITED0.64%0.10%0.10%
INTRINTERROLL HOLDING AG0.09%0.28%0.09%
EMAEMERALD RESOURCES NL0.06%0.06%0.06%
FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO., LTD.0.06%0.50%0.06%
MITSUI KINZOKU COMPANY, LIMITED0.06%0.43%0.06%
RESONAC HOLDINGS CORPORATION0.06%0.44%0.06%
ENLTENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD0.05%0.32%0.05%
KOCoca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc.0.05%0.08%0.05%
PLS GROUP LIMITED0.05%0.39%0.05%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in IDEV

ASMLASML Holding N.V.1.94%
HSBCHSBC HOLDINGS PLC1.09%
MUFGMitsubishi Corporation1.06%
ROCHE HOLDING AG1.04%
AZNASTRAZENECA PLC1.01%
NVSNovartis AG0.97%
NESTLE S.A.0.90%
SHELSHELL PLC0.90%
RYROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.87%
SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT0.78%

Only in SCZ

GETINGE AB (PUBL)0.12%
AT & S AUSTRIA TECHNOLOGIE & SYSTEMTECHNIK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT0.08%
DANIELI & C. OFFICINE MECCANICHE S.P.A.0.08%
KITRON ASA0.07%
DOF GROUP ASA0.06%
GRENERGY RENOVABLES, S.A.0.06%
KELLER GROUP PLC0.06%
PREDICTIVE DISCOVERY LTD0.06%
THE HYAKUGO BANK, LTD.0.06%
TOKYO CENTURY CORPORATION0.06%

Questions people ask

Is IDEV the same as SCZ?

12.2% of their weight sits in the same 832 holdings. IDEV also reports ASML, HSBC, MUFG, which the other does not. SCZ also reports GETINGE AB (PUBL), AT & S AUSTRIA TECHNOLOGIE & SYSTEMTECHNIK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, DANIELI & C. OFFICINE MECCANICHE S.P.A., which the other does not.

How is the overlap between IDEV and SCZ measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of IDEV and 96% of SCZ, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, SCZ or IDEV?

IDEV reports 1,653 stock positions and SCZ reports 1,894. 84.0% of IDEV's weight sits in names SCZ does not hold, and 22.7% of SCZ's weight in names IDEV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 10.6% of IDEV and 5.8% of SCZ.

How do IDEV and SCZ differ by sector?

The widest gap is Financial Services: IDEV has 7.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Other pairs with these funds

IDEV against other funds in the table

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.