IEFA vs IQLT overlap - what they share and where they differ
IEFA and IQLT share 39.5% of their weight across 248 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IEFA and IQLT
39.5%
248 shared positions
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 2,405 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 12.5%·Holdings of IEFA
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 281 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 22.7%·Holdings of IQLT
Reported positions cover IEFA 98%, IQLT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IQLT vs IEFA side by side
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
2,405
stock positions reported to the SEC
58.3% of its weight is in 2,157 names IQLT does not hold
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
281
stock positions reported to the SEC
8.7% of its weight is in 33 names IEFA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: IQLT has 5.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IEFA | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 2,405 | 281 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 12.5% | 22.7% |
| Largest position | ASML 2.5% | ASML 5.4% |
| Held alone | 2,157 positions, 58.3% | 33 positions, 8.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IEFA | In IQLT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASMLASML Holding N.V. | 2.50% | 5.42% | 2.50% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.25% | 2.30% | 1.25% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.12% | 1.78% | 1.12% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 1.00% | 1.68% | 1.00% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 1.00% | 1.81% | 1.00% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 1.00% | 1.59% | 1.00% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 0.83% | 1.49% | 0.83% |
| NODKNIPPON KANZAI Holdings Co.,Ltd. | 0.94% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
| ALLIANZ SE | 0.74% | 2.68% | 0.74% |
| SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE | 0.72% | 1.43% | 0.72% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IEFA
Only in IQLT
Questions people ask
Is IEFA the same as IQLT?
39.5% of their weight sits in the same 248 holdings. IEFA also reports HSBC, MUFG, SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, which the other does not. IQLT also reports CNQ, MFC, SU, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IEFA and IQLT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of IEFA and 99% of IQLT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IQLT or IEFA?
IEFA reports 2,405 stock positions and IQLT reports 281. 58.3% of IEFA's weight sits in names IQLT does not hold, and 8.7% of IQLT's weight in names IEFA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 12.5% of IEFA and 22.7% of IQLT.
How do IEFA and IQLT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: IQLT has 5.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.