IEFA vs IQLT overlap - what they share and where they differ
IEFA and IQLT share 37.0% of their weight across 251 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IEFA and IQLT
37.0%
251 shared positions
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,568 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 12.0%·Holdings of IEFA
IQLT
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 99% of the fund, 279 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 25.0%·Holdings of IQLT
Reported positions cover IEFA 97%, IQLT 99% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IQLT vs IEFA side by side
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
1,568
stock positions reported to the SEC
59.5% of its weight is in 1,317 names IQLT does not hold
IQLTiShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
279
stock positions reported to the SEC
8.3% of its weight is in 28 names IEFA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: IEFA has 5.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IEFA | IQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,568 | 279 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 12.0% | 25.0% |
| Largest position | ASML 2.2% | ASML 6.0% |
| Held alone | 1,317 positions, 59.5% | 28 positions, 8.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 97% | 99% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IEFA | In IQLT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASMLASML Holding N.V. | 2.21% | 6.04% | 2.21% |
| ROCHE HOLDING AG | 1.18% | 2.27% | 1.18% |
| AZNASTRAZENECA PLC | 1.16% | 2.02% | 1.16% |
| NVSNovartis AG | 1.11% | 2.25% | 1.11% |
| NESTLE S.A. | 1.03% | 1.99% | 1.03% |
| SHELSHELL PLC | 1.02% | 2.55% | 1.02% |
| BHPBHP GROUP LIMITED | 0.79% | 1.40% | 0.79% |
| NODKNIPPON KANZAI Holdings Co.,Ltd. | 0.93% | 0.76% | 0.76% |
| SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE | 0.69% | 1.54% | 0.69% |
| ALLIANZ SE | 0.68% | 2.49% | 0.68% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IEFA
Only in IQLT
Questions people ask
Is IEFA the same as IQLT?
37.0% of their weight sits in the same 251 holdings. IEFA also reports HSBC, MUFG, SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, which the other does not. IQLT also reports SU, MFC, AEM, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IEFA and IQLT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of IEFA and 99% of IQLT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IQLT or IEFA?
IEFA reports 1,568 stock positions and IQLT reports 279. 59.5% of IEFA's weight sits in names IQLT does not hold, and 8.3% of IQLT's weight in names IEFA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 12.0% of IEFA and 25.0% of IQLT.
How do IEFA and IQLT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: IEFA has 5.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IEFA against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.