IEMG vs KWEB overlap - what they share and where they differ
IEMG and KWEB share 5.9% of their weight across 23 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IEMG and KWEB
5.9%
23 shared positions
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 1,755 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 34.6%·Holdings of IEMG
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 33 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.0%·Holdings of KWEB
Reported positions cover IEMG 97%, KWEB 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
KWEB vs IEMG side by side
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1,755
stock positions reported to the SEC
90.6% of its weight is in 1,732 names KWEB does not hold
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
33
stock positions reported to the SEC
27.7% of its weight is in 10 names IEMG does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: KWEB has 23.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IEMG | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | May 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 1,755 | 33 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 34.6% | 60.0% |
| Largest position | TSM 12.5% | TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED 10.4% |
| Held alone | 1,732 positions, 90.6% | 10 positions, 27.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 97% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IEMG | In KWEB | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| TENCENT HOLDINGS LIMITED | 2.37% | 10.44% | 2.37% |
| BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.82% | 7.70% | 1.82% |
| MEITUAN | 0.33% | 6.83% | 0.33% |
| NTESNETEASE, INC. | 0.29% | 6.97% | 0.29% |
| BIDUBAIDU, INC. | 0.26% | 4.19% | 0.26% |
| JDJD.COM, INC. | 0.24% | 3.87% | 0.24% |
| TCOMTRIP.COM GROUP LIMITED | 0.20% | 3.69% | 0.20% |
| KUAISHOU TECHNOLOGY | 0.10% | 4.08% | 0.10% |
| KE HOLDINGS INC. | 0.08% | 3.89% | 0.08% |
| JD HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC | 0.04% | 3.50% | 0.04% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IEMG
Only in KWEB
Questions people ask
Is IEMG the same as KWEB?
5.9% of their weight sits in the same 23 holdings. IEMG also reports TSM, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SKHY, which the other does not. KWEB also reports PDD, YMM, TENCENT MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IEMG and KWEB measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of IEMG and 100% of KWEB, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, KWEB or IEMG?
IEMG reports 1,755 stock positions and KWEB reports 33. 90.6% of IEMG's weight sits in names KWEB does not hold, and 27.7% of KWEB's weight in names IEMG does not hold. The ten largest positions are 34.6% of IEMG and 60.0% of KWEB.
How do IEMG and KWEB differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: KWEB has 23.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IEMG against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.