IGF vs NLR overlap - what they share and where they differ
IGF and NLR share 3.2% of their weight across 2 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IGF and NLR
3.2%
2 shared positions
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Reported positions cover 84% of the fund, 64 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 34.5%·Holdings of IGF
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 25 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 61.1%·Holdings of NLR
Reported positions cover IGF 84%, NLR 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
NLR vs IGF side by side
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
64
stock positions reported to the SEC
80.6% of its weight is in 62 names NLR does not hold
NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
25
stock positions reported to the SEC
85.0% of its weight is in 23 names IGF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Basic Materials: NLR has 36.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IGF | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 64 | 25 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 34.5% | 61.1% |
| Largest position | AENA, S.M.E., S.A. 5.1% | CCJ 8.4% |
| Held alone | 62 positions, 80.6% | 23 positions, 85.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 84% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IGF | In NLR | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEGCONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION. | 2.08% | 8.04% | 2.08% |
| PEGPUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED | 1.09% | 7.09% | 1.09% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IGF
Only in NLR
Questions people ask
Is IGF the same as NLR?
3.2% of their weight sits in the same 2 holdings. IGF also reports AENA, S.M.E., S.A., NEE, IBERDROLA, S.A., which the other does not. NLR also reports CCJ, BWXT, FORTUM OYJ, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IGF and NLR measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 84% of IGF and 100% of NLR, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, NLR or IGF?
IGF reports 64 stock positions and NLR reports 25. 80.6% of IGF's weight sits in names NLR does not hold, and 85.0% of NLR's weight in names IGF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 34.5% of IGF and 61.1% of NLR.
How do IGF and NLR differ by sector?
The widest gap is Basic Materials: NLR has 36.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.