IGM vs IYW overlap - what they share and where they differ
IGM and IYW share 71.9% of their weight across 115 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IGM and IYW
71.9%
115 shared positions
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 273 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 58.1%·Holdings of IGM
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 135 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 65.6%·Holdings of IYW
Reported positions cover IGM 100%, IYW 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IYW vs IGM side by side
IGMiShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
273
stock positions reported to the SEC
12.5% of its weight is in 158 names IYW does not hold
IYWiShares U.S. Technology ETF
135
stock positions reported to the SEC
1.8% of its weight is in 20 names IGM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IYW has 2.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IGM | IYW | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 273 | 135 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 58.1% | 65.6% |
| Largest position | GOOGL 8.0% | NVDA 16.2% |
| Held alone | 158 positions, 12.5% | 20 positions, 1.8% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IGM | In IYW | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. | 7.98% | 14.17% | 7.98% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 7.96% | 16.23% | 7.96% |
| AAPLApple, Inc. | 7.91% | 13.63% | 7.91% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 7.49% | 3.99% | 3.99% |
| AVGOBroadcom, Inc. | 7.60% | 3.78% | 3.78% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.13% | 3.50% | 3.50% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.46% | 2.98% | 2.98% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 4.16% | 2.80% | 2.80% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 2.87% | 2.56% | 2.56% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp. | 2.36% | 1.98% | 1.98% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IGM
Only in IYW
Questions people ask
Is IGM the same as IYW?
71.9% of their weight sits in the same 115 holdings. IGM also reports CSCO, NFLX, STX, which the other does not. IYW also reports VRT, DASH, LDOS, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IGM and IYW measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IGM and 100% of IYW, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IYW or IGM?
IGM reports 273 stock positions and IYW reports 135. 12.5% of IGM's weight sits in names IYW does not hold, and 1.8% of IYW's weight in names IGM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 58.1% of IGM and 65.6% of IYW.
How do IGM and IYW differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IYW has 2.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.