IGV vs QTEC overlap - what they share and where they differ
IGV and QTEC share 26.6% of their weight across 15 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IGV and QTEC
26.6%
15 shared positions
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 107 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.7%·Holdings of IGV
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 46 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 28.7%·Holdings of QTEC
Reported positions cover IGV 100%, QTEC 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QTEC vs IGV side by side
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
107
stock positions reported to the SEC
37.0% of its weight is in 92 names QTEC does not hold
QTECFirst Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
46
stock positions reported to the SEC
71.5% of its weight is in 31 names IGV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IGV has 4.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IGV | QTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 107 | 46 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 60.7% | 28.7% |
| Largest position | PANW 10.4% | AMAT 3.4% |
| Held alone | 92 positions, 37.0% | 31 positions, 71.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IGV | In QTEC | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 10.37% | 2.54% | 2.54% |
| FTNTFortinet, Inc. | 3.62% | 2.33% | 2.33% |
| DDOGDatadog, Inc. | 3.26% | 2.21% | 2.21% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc. | 7.28% | 2.19% | 2.19% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 3.91% | 2.10% | 2.10% |
| SNPSSynopsys, Inc. | 3.23% | 1.96% | 1.96% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. | 4.76% | 1.76% | 1.76% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 8.07% | 1.74% | 1.74% |
| ADBEAdobe, Inc. | 3.13% | 1.66% | 1.66% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.73% | 1.65% | 1.65% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IGV
Only in QTEC
Questions people ask
Is IGV the same as QTEC?
26.6% of their weight sits in the same 15 holdings. IGV also reports ORCL, CRM, NOW, which the other does not. QTEC also reports AMAT, KLAC, MRVL, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IGV and QTEC measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IGV and 100% of QTEC, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QTEC or IGV?
IGV reports 107 stock positions and QTEC reports 46. 37.0% of IGV's weight sits in names QTEC does not hold, and 71.5% of QTEC's weight in names IGV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 60.7% of IGV and 28.7% of QTEC.
How do IGV and QTEC differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IGV has 4.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.