IGV vs RSPT overlap - what they share and where they differ
IGV and RSPT share 22.6% of their weight across 22 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IGV and RSPT
22.6%
22 shared positions
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 107 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.7%·Holdings of IGV
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 73 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 19.5%·Holdings of RSPT
Reported positions cover IGV 100%, RSPT 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
RSPT vs IGV side by side
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
107
stock positions reported to the SEC
20.2% of its weight is in 85 names RSPT does not hold
RSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
73
stock positions reported to the SEC
74.6% of its weight is in 51 names IGV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IGV has 6.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IGV | RSPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Apr 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 107 | 73 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 60.7% | 19.5% |
| Largest position | PANW 10.4% | INTC 2.3% |
| Held alone | 85 positions, 20.2% | 51 positions, 74.6% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IGV | In RSPT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 3.91% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
| SNPSSynopsys, Inc. | 3.23% | 1.33% | 1.33% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 10.37% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
| DDOGDatadog, Inc. | 3.26% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc. | 7.28% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| FTNTFortinet, Inc. | 3.62% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 8.07% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| ROPRoper Technologies, Inc. | 1.29% | 1.20% | 1.20% |
| ORCLOracle Corp. | 6.26% | 1.18% | 1.18% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. | 4.76% | 1.15% | 1.15% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IGV
Only in RSPT
Questions people ask
Is IGV the same as RSPT?
22.6% of their weight sits in the same 22 holdings. IGV also reports ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., TTWO, MSTR, which the other does not. RSPT also reports INTC, STX, AMD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IGV and RSPT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IGV and 100% of RSPT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, RSPT or IGV?
IGV reports 107 stock positions and RSPT reports 73. 20.2% of IGV's weight sits in names RSPT does not hold, and 74.6% of RSPT's weight in names IGV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 60.7% of IGV and 19.5% of RSPT.
How do IGV and RSPT differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IGV has 6.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.