IGV vs VGT overlap - what they share and where they differ
IGV and VGT share 22.0% of their weight across 95 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IGV and VGT
22.0%
95 shared positions
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 107 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 60.7%·Holdings of IGV
VGT
VANGUARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 286 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 59.4%·Holdings of VGT
Reported positions cover IGV 100%, VGT 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VGT vs IGV side by side
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
107
stock positions reported to the SEC
5.8% of its weight is in 12 names VGT does not hold
VGTVANGUARD INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDEX FUND
286
stock positions reported to the SEC
76.5% of its weight is in 191 names IGV does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
No sector differs by more than a point between the two.
The figures side by side
| IGV | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 107 | 286 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 60.7% | 59.4% |
| Largest position | PANW 10.4% | NVDA 16.8% |
| Held alone | 12 positions, 5.8% | 191 positions, 76.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IGV | In VGT | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp. | 8.07% | 9.46% | 8.07% |
| ORCLOracle Corp. | 6.26% | 1.45% | 1.45% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc. | 7.70% | 1.35% | 1.35% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | 10.37% | 0.92% | 0.92% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc. | 7.28% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| CRMSalesforce, Inc. | 4.81% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. | 4.76% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
| NOWServiceNow, Inc. | 3.87% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
| ADBEAdobe, Inc. | 3.13% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. | 3.91% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IGV
Only in VGT
Questions people ask
Is IGV the same as VGT?
22.0% of their weight sits in the same 95 holdings. IGV also reports ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., TTWO, ZM, which the other does not. VGT also reports NVDA, AAPL, AVGO, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IGV and VGT measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IGV and 100% of VGT, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VGT or IGV?
IGV reports 107 stock positions and VGT reports 286. 5.8% of IGV's weight sits in names VGT does not hold, and 76.5% of VGT's weight in names IGV does not hold. The ten largest positions are 60.7% of IGV and 59.4% of VGT.
How do IGV and VGT differ by sector?
No sector differs by more than a point between the two. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
VGT against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.