IJH vs XMMO overlap - what they share and where they differ
IJH and XMMO share 27.0% of their weight across 74 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IJH and XMMO
27.0%
74 shared positions
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 400 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 7.7%·Holdings of IJH
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 75 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 28.9%·Holdings of XMMO
Reported positions cover IJH 100%, XMMO 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XMMO vs IJH side by side
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
400
stock positions reported to the SEC
72.8% of its weight is in 326 names XMMO does not hold
XMMOInvesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
75
stock positions reported to the SEC
0.3% of its weight is in 1 names IJH does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: IJH has 12.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IJH | XMMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 400 | 75 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 7.7% | 28.9% |
| Largest position | TWLO 0.9% | CW 4.3% |
| Held alone | 326 positions, 72.8% | 1 positions, 0.3% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IJH | In XMMO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRSCARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP | 0.84% | 2.28% | 0.84% |
| MKSIMKS INC | 0.83% | 2.17% | 0.83% |
| CWCURTISS-WRIGHT CORP | 0.77% | 4.25% | 0.77% |
| NVTNVENT ELECTRIC PLC | 0.76% | 2.70% | 0.76% |
| ATIATI INC | 0.74% | 3.43% | 0.74% |
| FTITECHNIPFMC PLC | 0.73% | 3.69% | 0.73% |
| MTZMASTEC INC | 0.71% | 1.63% | 0.71% |
| STRLSTERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC | 0.71% | 2.70% | 0.71% |
| WWDWOODWARD INC | 0.70% | 2.78% | 0.70% |
| MTSIMACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC | 0.69% | 1.44% | 0.69% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IJH
Only in XMMO
Questions people ask
Is IJH the same as XMMO?
27.0% of their weight sits in the same 74 holdings. IJH also reports TWLO, ENTG, ILMN, which the other does not. XMMO also reports TNL, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IJH and XMMO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IJH and 100% of XMMO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XMMO or IJH?
IJH reports 400 stock positions and XMMO reports 75. 72.8% of IJH's weight sits in names XMMO does not hold, and 0.3% of XMMO's weight in names IJH does not hold. The ten largest positions are 7.7% of IJH and 28.9% of XMMO.
How do IJH and XMMO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Cyclical: IJH has 12.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IJH against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.