IJS vs KRE overlap - what they share and where they differ
IJS and KRE share 12.3% of their weight across 54 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IJS and KRE
12.3%
54 shared positions
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 458 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 8.2%·Holdings of IJS
KRE
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 159 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 13.7%·Holdings of KRE
Reported positions cover IJS 98%, KRE 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
KRE vs IJS side by side
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
458
stock positions reported to the SEC
86.0% of its weight is in 404 names KRE does not hold
KREState Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF
159
stock positions reported to the SEC
62.4% of its weight is in 105 names IJS does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: KRE has 73.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IJS | KRE | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 458 | 159 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 8.2% | 13.7% |
| Largest position | MOH 1.3% | FBNC 1.5% |
| Held alone | 404 positions, 86.0% | 105 positions, 62.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IJS | In KRE | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUBATLANTIC UNION BANKSHARES CORP | 0.65% | 1.37% | 0.65% |
| FULTFULTON FINANCIAL CORP | 0.49% | 1.35% | 0.49% |
| CATYCATHAY GENERAL BANCORP | 0.45% | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| UCBUNITED COMMUNITY BANKS INC | 0.45% | 0.91% | 0.45% |
| RNSTRENASANT CORP | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.42% |
| CVBFCVB FINANCIAL CORP | 0.41% | 1.10% | 0.41% |
| FFBCFIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP | 0.38% | 0.81% | 0.38% |
| FHBFIRST HAWAIIAN INC | 0.38% | 1.32% | 0.38% |
| BOHBANK OF HAWAII CORP | 0.35% | 1.06% | 0.35% |
| FIBKFIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM INC | 0.35% | 1.35% | 0.35% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IJS
Only in KRE
Questions people ask
Is IJS the same as KRE?
12.3% of their weight sits in the same 54 holdings. IJS also reports MOH, MTCH, EMN, which the other does not. KRE also reports PNFP, UMBF, ASB, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IJS and KRE measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of IJS and 100% of KRE, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, KRE or IJS?
IJS reports 458 stock positions and KRE reports 159. 86.0% of IJS's weight sits in names KRE does not hold, and 62.4% of KRE's weight in names IJS does not hold. The ten largest positions are 8.2% of IJS and 13.7% of KRE.
How do IJS and KRE differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: KRE has 73.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.