IJS vs SCHA overlap - what they share and where they differ
IJS and SCHA share 22.3% of their weight across 425 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IJS and SCHA
22.3%
425 shared positions
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 458 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 8.2%·Holdings of IJS
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 1,552 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 10.5%·Holdings of SCHA
Reported positions cover IJS 98%, SCHA 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SCHA vs IJS side by side
IJSiShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
458
stock positions reported to the SEC
14.6% of its weight is in 33 names SCHA does not hold
SCHASchwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1,552
stock positions reported to the SEC
77.5% of its weight is in 1,127 names IJS does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: SCHA has 15.0 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IJS | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 458 | 1,552 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 8.2% | 10.5% |
| Largest position | MOH 1.3% | SANDISK CORP/DE 5.3% |
| Held alone | 33 positions, 14.6% | 1,127 positions, 77.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IJS | In SCHA | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUMNLUMEN TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.43% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| ESIELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC | 0.59% | 0.20% | 0.20% |
| ENPHENPHASE ENERGY INC | 0.70% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| MXLMAXLINEAR INC | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| JXNJACKSON FINANCIAL INC | 0.60% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| PLXSPLEXUS CORP | 0.48% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| RALRALLIANT CORP | 0.42% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| SMSM ENERGY COMPANY | 0.64% | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| EPRTESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST INC | 0.23% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| GTESGATES INDUSTRIAL CORP PLC | 0.35% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IJS
Only in SCHA
Questions people ask
Is IJS the same as SCHA?
22.3% of their weight sits in the same 425 holdings. IJS also reports MOH, MTCH, EMN, which the other does not. SCHA also reports SANDISK CORP/DE, LITE, RVMD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IJS and SCHA measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of IJS and 100% of SCHA, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SCHA or IJS?
IJS reports 458 stock positions and SCHA reports 1,552. 14.6% of IJS's weight sits in names SCHA does not hold, and 77.5% of SCHA's weight in names IJS does not hold. The ten largest positions are 8.2% of IJS and 10.5% of SCHA.
How do IJS and SCHA differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: SCHA has 15.0 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.