ITA vs IWP overlap - what they share and where they differ
ITA and IWP share 7.6% of their weight across 12 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
ITA and IWP
7.6%
12 shared positions
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 47 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 75.2%·Holdings of ITA
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 261 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 19.7%·Holdings of IWP
Reported positions cover ITA 100%, IWP 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
IWP vs ITA side by side
ITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
47
stock positions reported to the SEC
78.3% of its weight is in 35 names IWP does not hold
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
261
stock positions reported to the SEC
92.2% of its weight is in 249 names ITA does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: ITA has 45.1 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| ITA | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 47 | 261 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 75.2% | 19.7% |
| Largest position | GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 22.6% | DDOG 2.3% |
| Held alone | 35 positions, 78.3% | 249 positions, 92.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In ITA | In IWP | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| RKLBROCKET LAB CORPORATION | 3.63% | 1.49% | 1.49% |
| AXONAXON ENTERPRISE, INC. | 3.17% | 1.19% | 1.19% |
| HEIHEICO CORPORATION | 2.41% | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| CRSCARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION | 2.15% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
| FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd. | 1.95% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| ATIATI INC | 1.89% | 0.73% | 0.73% |
| WWDWOODWARD, INC. | 1.78% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| BWXTBWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 1.25% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
| CWCURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION | 1.96% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| KRMNKARMAN HOLDINGS INC. | 0.32% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in ITA
Only in IWP
Questions people ask
Is ITA the same as IWP?
7.6% of their weight sits in the same 12 holdings. ITA also reports GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, RTX, BA, which the other does not. IWP also reports DDOG, SNOW, NET, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between ITA and IWP measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of ITA and 100% of IWP, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, IWP or ITA?
ITA reports 47 stock positions and IWP reports 261. 78.3% of ITA's weight sits in names IWP does not hold, and 92.2% of IWP's weight in names ITA does not hold. The ten largest positions are 75.2% of ITA and 19.7% of IWP.
How do ITA and IWP differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: ITA has 45.1 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.