IVW vs SCHG overlap - what they share and where they differ
IVW and SCHG share 66.5% of their weight across 72 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IVW and SCHG
66.5%
72 shared positions
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 145 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.0%·Holdings of IVW
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 192 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 60.1%·Holdings of SCHG
Reported positions cover IVW 100%, SCHG 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SCHG vs IVW side by side
IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
145
stock positions reported to the SEC
27.4% of its weight is in 73 names SCHG does not hold
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
192
stock positions reported to the SEC
16.5% of its weight is in 120 names IVW does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IVW has 6.9 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IVW | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 145 | 192 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 59.0% | 60.1% |
| Largest position | NVDA 13.7% | NVDA 11.0% |
| Held alone | 73 positions, 27.4% | 120 positions, 16.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IVW | In SCHG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 13.65% | 11.01% | 11.01% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 10.60% | 8.53% | 8.53% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 7.80% | 7.17% | 7.17% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 5.98% | 9.83% | 5.98% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 5.04% | 4.55% | 4.55% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.48% | 5.67% | 3.48% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.48% | 3.45% | 3.45% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 2.67% | 2.93% | 2.67% |
| LLYELI LILLY & COMPANY | 2.67% | 3.05% | 2.67% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 2.07% | 3.91% | 2.07% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IVW
Only in SCHG
Questions people ask
Is IVW the same as SCHG?
66.5% of their weight sits in the same 72 holdings. IVW also reports MU, BRK.A, JPM, which the other does not. SCHG also reports COST, UNH, LIN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IVW and SCHG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IVW and 100% of SCHG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SCHG or IVW?
IVW reports 145 stock positions and SCHG reports 192. 27.4% of IVW's weight sits in names SCHG does not hold, and 16.5% of SCHG's weight in names IVW does not hold. The ten largest positions are 59.0% of IVW and 60.1% of SCHG.
How do IVW and SCHG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IVW has 6.9 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVW against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.