IVW vs XLG overlap - what they share and where they differ
IVW and XLG share 72.2% of their weight across 34 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IVW and XLG
72.2%
34 shared positions
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 145 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 59.0%·Holdings of IVW
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 50 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 62.4%·Holdings of XLG
Reported positions cover IVW 100%, XLG 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLG vs IVW side by side
IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
145
stock positions reported to the SEC
18.2% of its weight is in 111 names XLG does not hold
XLGInvesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
50
stock positions reported to the SEC
13.4% of its weight is in 16 names IVW does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: IVW has 5.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IVW | XLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 145 | 50 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 59.0% | 62.4% |
| Largest position | NVDA 13.7% | NVDA 12.1% |
| Held alone | 111 positions, 18.2% | 16 positions, 13.4% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IVW | In XLG | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 13.65% | 12.06% | 12.06% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC | 10.60% | 9.36% | 9.36% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 7.80% | 8.56% | 7.80% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 5.98% | 11.26% | 5.98% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 5.04% | 4.57% | 4.57% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.48% | 6.60% | 3.48% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.48% | 3.03% | 3.03% |
| BRK.ABERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC | 2.58% | 2.33% | 2.33% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 3.67% | 2.30% | 2.30% |
| LLYELI LILLY & COMPANY | 2.67% | 2.25% | 2.25% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IVW
Only in XLG
Questions people ask
Is IVW the same as XLG?
72.2% of their weight sits in the same 34 holdings. IVW also reports RTX, APH, CRWD, which the other does not. XLG also reports XOM, WMT, INTC, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IVW and XLG measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IVW and 100% of XLG, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLG or IVW?
IVW reports 145 stock positions and XLG reports 50. 18.2% of IVW's weight sits in names XLG does not hold, and 13.4% of XLG's weight in names IVW does not hold. The ten largest positions are 59.0% of IVW and 62.4% of XLG.
How do IVW and XLG differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: IVW has 5.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IVW against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.