IWF vs JGRO overlap - what they share and where they differ
IWF and JGRO share 63.5% of their weight across 86 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IWF and JGRO
63.5%
86 shared positions
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 311 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.2%·Holdings of IWF
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 126 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 45.4%·Holdings of JGRO
Reported positions cover IWF 100%, JGRO 98% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
JGRO vs IWF side by side
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
311
stock positions reported to the SEC
16.9% of its weight is in 225 names JGRO does not hold
JGROJPMorgan Active Growth ETF
126
stock positions reported to the SEC
15.7% of its weight is in 40 names IWF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: IWF has 5.2 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IWF | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 311 | 126 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 57.2% | 45.4% |
| Largest position | NVDA 13.8% | NVDA 10.5% |
| Held alone | 225 positions, 16.9% | 40 positions, 15.7% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 98% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IWF | In JGRO | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 13.83% | 10.46% | 10.46% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 11.15% | 10.36% | 10.36% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 6.72% | 4.76% | 4.76% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 5.21% | 4.36% | 4.36% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 3.86% | 3.70% | 3.70% |
| TSLATESLA, INC. | 3.64% | 2.81% | 2.81% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2.80% | 3.15% | 2.80% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 3.00% | 2.13% | 2.13% |
| LLYELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 2.84% | 1.81% | 1.81% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 1.60% | 1.89% | 1.60% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IWF
Only in JGRO
Questions people ask
Is IWF the same as JGRO?
63.5% of their weight sits in the same 86 holdings. IWF also reports KLAC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, HD, which the other does not. JGRO also reports GS, TSM, JNJ, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IWF and JGRO measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IWF and 98% of JGRO, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, JGRO or IWF?
IWF reports 311 stock positions and JGRO reports 126. 16.9% of IWF's weight sits in names JGRO does not hold, and 15.7% of JGRO's weight in names IWF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 57.2% of IWF and 45.4% of JGRO.
How do IWF and JGRO differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: IWF has 5.2 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IWF against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.