IWF vs QQQ overlap - what they share and where they differ
IWF and QQQ share 58.2% of their weight across 60 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IWF and QQQ
58.2%
60 shared positions
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 311 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.2%·Holdings of IWF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 101 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 47.8%·Holdings of QQQ
Reported positions cover IWF 100%, QQQ 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QQQ vs IWF side by side
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
311
stock positions reported to the SEC
27.4% of its weight is in 251 names QQQ does not hold
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
101
stock positions reported to the SEC
19.2% of its weight is in 41 names IWF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: QQQ has 5.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IWF | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 311 | 101 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 57.2% | 47.8% |
| Largest position | NVDA 13.8% | NVDA 7.6% |
| Held alone | 251 positions, 27.4% | 41 positions, 19.2% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IWF | In QQQ | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 13.83% | 7.60% | 7.60% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 6.72% | 6.67% | 6.67% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 11.15% | 6.29% | 6.29% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.11% | 4.35% | 4.11% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 3.86% | 5.64% | 3.86% |
| TSLATESLA, INC. | 3.64% | 3.30% | 3.30% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 5.21% | 2.81% | 2.81% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2.80% | 4.10% | 2.80% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 3.00% | 2.62% | 2.62% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 1.70% | 2.49% | 1.70% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IWF
Only in QQQ
Questions people ask
Is IWF the same as QQQ?
58.2% of their weight sits in the same 60 holdings. IWF also reports LLY, V, CAT, which the other does not. QQQ also reports INTC, CSCO, LIN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IWF and QQQ measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IWF and 100% of QQQ, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QQQ or IWF?
IWF reports 311 stock positions and QQQ reports 101. 27.4% of IWF's weight sits in names QQQ does not hold, and 19.2% of QQQ's weight in names IWF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 57.2% of IWF and 47.8% of QQQ.
How do IWF and QQQ differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: QQQ has 5.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IWF against other funds in the table
QQQ against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.