IWF vs QQQM overlap - what they share and where they differ
IWF and QQQM share 59.5% of their weight across 58 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IWF and QQQM
59.5%
58 shared positions
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 311 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.2%·Holdings of IWF
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 50.3%·Holdings of QQQM
Reported positions cover IWF 100%, QQQM 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
QQQM vs IWF side by side
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
311
stock positions reported to the SEC
28.0% of its weight is in 253 names QQQM does not hold
QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
18.9% of its weight is in 42 names IWF does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: QQQM has 5.7 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IWF | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 311 | 100 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 57.2% | 50.3% |
| Largest position | NVDA 13.8% | NVDA 8.1% |
| Held alone | 253 positions, 28.0% | 42 positions, 18.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IWF | In QQQM | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 13.83% | 8.13% | 8.13% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 11.15% | 6.75% | 6.75% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 6.72% | 7.26% | 6.72% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.11% | 5.30% | 4.11% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 3.86% | 4.78% | 3.86% |
| TSLATESLA, INC. | 3.64% | 3.45% | 3.45% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 5.21% | 3.36% | 3.36% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS, INC. | 3.00% | 2.96% | 2.96% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2.80% | 3.68% | 2.80% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 1.60% | 1.74% | 1.60% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IWF
Only in QQQM
Questions people ask
Is IWF the same as QQQM?
59.5% of their weight sits in the same 58 holdings. IWF also reports LLY, V, CAT, which the other does not. QQQM also reports INTC, CSCO, QCOM, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IWF and QQQM measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IWF and 100% of QQQM, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, QQQM or IWF?
IWF reports 311 stock positions and QQQM reports 100. 28.0% of IWF's weight sits in names QQQM does not hold, and 18.9% of QQQM's weight in names IWF does not hold. The ten largest positions are 57.2% of IWF and 50.3% of QQQM.
How do IWF and QQQM differ by sector?
The widest gap is Consumer Defensive: QQQM has 5.7 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Other pairs with these funds
IWF against other funds in the table
QQQM against other funds in the table
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.