IWX vs XLF overlap - what they share and where they differ
IWX and XLF share 20.0% of their weight across 31 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IWX and XLF
20.0%
31 shared positions
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 151 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 39.0%·Holdings of IWX
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 76 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 57.6%·Holdings of XLF
Reported positions cover IWX 100%, XLF 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLF vs IWX side by side
IWXiShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
151
stock positions reported to the SEC
79.9% of its weight is in 120 names XLF does not hold
XLFState Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
76
stock positions reported to the SEC
29.1% of its weight is in 45 names IWX does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Financial Services: XLF has 77.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IWX | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 151 | 76 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 39.0% | 57.6% |
| Largest position | AMZN 8.3% | BRK.A 12.1% |
| Held alone | 120 positions, 79.9% | 45 positions, 29.1% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IWX | In XLF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRK.ABERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC | 3.66% | 12.08% | 3.66% |
| JPMJP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY | 3.44% | 11.55% | 3.44% |
| BACBANK OF AMERICA CORP | 1.38% | 4.90% | 1.38% |
| GSGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) | 1.14% | 3.93% | 1.14% |
| WFCWELLS FARGO & COMPANY | 0.99% | 3.33% | 0.99% |
| MSMORGAN STANLEY | 0.92% | 3.30% | 0.92% |
| CCITIGROUP INC | 0.79% | 3.14% | 0.79% |
| BLKBLACKROCK INC | 0.58% | 1.83% | 0.58% |
| SCHWCHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) | 0.55% | 1.99% | 0.55% |
| AXPAMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | 0.50% | 2.37% | 0.50% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IWX
Only in XLF
Questions people ask
Is IWX the same as XLF?
20.0% of their weight sits in the same 31 holdings. IWX also reports AMZN, AAPL, MSFT, which the other does not. XLF also reports V, MA, HOOD, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IWX and XLF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IWX and 100% of XLF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLF or IWX?
IWX reports 151 stock positions and XLF reports 76. 79.9% of IWX's weight sits in names XLF does not hold, and 29.1% of XLF's weight in names IWX does not hold. The ten largest positions are 39.0% of IWX and 57.6% of XLF.
How do IWX and XLF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Financial Services: XLF has 77.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.