IXC vs OIH overlap - what they share and where they differ

IXC and OIH share 5.0% of their weight across 4 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.

Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.

IXC and OIH

5.0%

4 shared positions

IXC

iShares Global Energy ETF

Reported positions cover 97% of the fund, 47 positions · Jun 30, 2026

Top 10: 57.4%·Holdings of IXC

OIH

VanEck Oil Services ETF

Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 25 positions · Jun 30, 2026

Top 10: 70.6%·Holdings of OIH

Reported positions cover IXC 97%, OIH 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.

OIH vs IXC side by side

IXCiShares Global Energy ETF

47

stock positions reported to the SEC

92.4% of its weight is in 43 names OIH does not hold

OIHVanEck Oil Services ETF

25

stock positions reported to the SEC

57.6% of its weight is in 21 names IXC does not hold

Where each fund's weight sits

IXC
OIH
shared with the other fundheld alonenot covered by the filing (cash, futures, bonds)

Largest sectors for both funds

Energy
90.5%
91.6%
Industrials
0.0%
2.3%
Basic Materials
1.4%
0.0%

The widest gap is Industrials: OIH has 2.3 points more of it.

The figures side by side

IXCOIH
Filing dateJun 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026
Stock positions reported4725
Weight of the ten largest57.4%70.6%
Largest positionXOM 17.6%SLB 19.0%
Held alone43 positions, 92.4%21 positions, 57.6%
Covered by stock positions97%100%

Holdings they share

StockIn IXCIn OIHCounted
SLBSLB N.V.2.16%19.00%2.16%
BKRBAKER HUGHES COMPANY1.71%11.86%1.71%
HALHALLIBURTON COMPANY0.88%6.45%0.88%
TENARIS S.A.0.28%5.12%0.28%

What each holds alone

The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.

Only in IXC

XOMEXXON MOBIL CORPORATION17.58%
CVXCHEVRON CORPORATION9.63%
SHELSHELL PLC6.75%
TTETOTALENERGIES SE5.03%
COPCONOCOPHILLIPS3.93%
ENBEnbridge Inc.3.67%
BPBP P.L.C.3.00%
WMBTHE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.2.82%
CNQCANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED2.56%
VLOVALERO ENERGY CORPORATION2.40%

Only in OIH

FTITechnipFMC PLC6.96%
SEISolaris Energy Infrastructure Inc5.20%
WFRDWeatherford International PLC4.24%
RIGTransocean Ltd4.15%
NENoble Corp PLC3.96%
LBRTLiberty Energy Inc3.65%
NOVNOV Inc3.60%
OIIOceaneering International Inc3.25%
VALValaris Ltd3.10%
PTENPatterson-UTI Energy Inc2.89%

Questions people ask

Is IXC the same as OIH?

5.0% of their weight sits in the same 4 holdings. IXC also reports XOM, CVX, SHEL, which the other does not. OIH also reports FTI, SEI, WFRD, which the other does not.

How is the overlap between IXC and OIH measured?

For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 97% of IXC and 100% of OIH, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.

Which holds more, OIH or IXC?

IXC reports 47 stock positions and OIH reports 25. 92.4% of IXC's weight sits in names OIH does not hold, and 57.6% of OIH's weight in names IXC does not hold. The ten largest positions are 57.4% of IXC and 70.6% of OIH.

How do IXC and OIH differ by sector?

The widest gap is Industrials: OIH has 2.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.

Where do the numbers come from?

From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.

Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs

Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.