IXJ vs MGV overlap - what they share and where they differ
IXJ and MGV share 15.5% of their weight across 18 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IXJ and MGV
15.5%
18 shared positions
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 107 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 48.2%·Holdings of IXJ
MGV
VANGUARD MEGA CAP VALUE INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 119 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 29.3%·Holdings of MGV
Reported positions cover IXJ 100%, MGV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
MGV vs IXJ side by side
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
107
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.8% of its weight is in 89 names MGV does not hold
MGVVANGUARD MEGA CAP VALUE INDEX FUND
119
stock positions reported to the SEC
84.0% of its weight is in 101 names IXJ does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Healthcare: IXJ has 63.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IXJ | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 107 | 119 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 48.2% | 29.3% |
| Largest position | LLY 10.9% | MU 5.3% |
| Held alone | 89 positions, 56.8% | 101 positions, 84.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IXJ | In MGV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 7.04% | 2.61% | 2.61% |
| ABBVABBVIE INC. | 5.12% | 1.85% | 1.85% |
| UNHUNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | 4.40% | 1.66% | 1.66% |
| MRKMERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien | 4.40% | 1.41% | 1.41% |
| TMOTHERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED | 2.42% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| AMGNAMGEN INC. | 2.54% | 0.87% | 0.87% |
| GILDGILEAD SCIENCES, INC. | 2.04% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
| ABTABBOTT LABORATORIES | 2.05% | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| PFEPFIZER INC. | 1.78% | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| BMYBRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY | 1.53% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IXJ
Only in MGV
Questions people ask
Is IXJ the same as MGV?
15.5% of their weight sits in the same 18 holdings. IXJ also reports LLY, ROCHE HOLDING AG, AZN, which the other does not. MGV also reports MU, BRK.A, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IXJ and MGV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IXJ and 100% of MGV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, MGV or IXJ?
IXJ reports 107 stock positions and MGV reports 119. 56.8% of IXJ's weight sits in names MGV does not hold, and 84.0% of MGV's weight in names IXJ does not hold. The ten largest positions are 48.2% of IXJ and 29.3% of MGV.
How do IXJ and MGV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Healthcare: IXJ has 63.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.