IYM vs PAVE overlap - what they share and where they differ
IYM and PAVE share 13.9% of their weight across 10 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
IYM and PAVE
13.9%
10 shared positions
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 38 positions · Apr 30, 2026
Top 10: 66.0%·Holdings of IYM
PAVE
Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 100 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 32.3%·Holdings of PAVE
Reported positions cover IYM 100%, PAVE 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
PAVE vs IYM side by side
IYMiShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
38
stock positions reported to the SEC
77.1% of its weight is in 28 names PAVE does not hold
PAVEGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
100
stock positions reported to the SEC
85.9% of its weight is in 90 names IYM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Industrials: PAVE has 29.6 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| IYM | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Apr 30, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 38 | 100 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 66.0% | 32.3% |
| Largest position | LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 19.9% | PWR 4.2% |
| Held alone | 28 positions, 77.1% | 90 positions, 85.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In IYM | In PAVE | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NUENUCOR CORPORATION | 4.43% | 3.10% | 3.10% |
| FASTFASTENAL COMPANY | 3.88% | 2.71% | 2.71% |
| STLDSTEEL DYNAMICS, INC. | 3.38% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
| CRSCARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION | 2.29% | 1.27% | 1.27% |
| AAALCOA CORPORATION | 1.83% | 1.09% | 1.09% |
| RSRELIANCE, INC. | 2.11% | 1.08% | 1.08% |
| RBCRBC BEARINGS INCORPORATED | 2.07% | 0.98% | 0.98% |
| MLIMUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. | 1.63% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
| WLKWESTLAKE CORPORATION | 0.43% | 0.60% | 0.43% |
| CLFCLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. | 0.64% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in IYM
Only in PAVE
Questions people ask
Is IYM the same as PAVE?
13.9% of their weight sits in the same 10 holdings. IYM also reports LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, NEM, FCX, which the other does not. PAVE also reports PWR, CSX, EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between IYM and PAVE measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of IYM and 100% of PAVE, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, PAVE or IYM?
IYM reports 38 stock positions and PAVE reports 100. 77.1% of IYM's weight sits in names PAVE does not hold, and 85.9% of PAVE's weight in names IYM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 66.0% of IYM and 32.3% of PAVE.
How do IYM and PAVE differ by sector?
The widest gap is Industrials: PAVE has 29.6 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.