JGRO vs OEF overlap - what they share and where they differ
JGRO and OEF share 55.3% of their weight across 46 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
JGRO and OEF
55.3%
46 shared positions
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
Reported positions cover 98% of the fund, 127 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 45.4%·Holdings of JGRO
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 101 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 52.8%·Holdings of OEF
Reported positions cover JGRO 98%, OEF 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
OEF vs JGRO side by side
JGROJPMorgan Active Growth ETF
127
stock positions reported to the SEC
33.3% of its weight is in 81 names OEF does not hold
OEFiShares S&P 100 ETF
101
stock positions reported to the SEC
19.5% of its weight is in 55 names JGRO does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: JGRO has 7.4 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| JGRO | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 127 | 101 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 45.4% | 52.8% |
| Largest position | NVDA 10.5% | NVDA 10.5% |
| Held alone | 81 positions, 33.3% | 55 positions, 19.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 98% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In JGRO | In OEF | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp. | 10.46% | 10.47% | 10.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet, Inc. | 10.36% | 8.14% | 8.14% |
| AAPLApple, Inc. | 4.76% | 9.18% | 4.76% |
| AVGOBroadcom, Inc. | 4.36% | 3.86% | 3.86% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.70% | 2.81% | 2.81% |
| TSLATesla, Inc. | 2.81% | 2.56% | 2.56% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.13% | 2.67% | 2.13% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 3.15% | 2.05% | 2.05% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.81% | 2.05% | 1.81% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.29% | 1.24% | 1.24% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in JGRO
Only in OEF
Questions people ask
Is JGRO the same as OEF?
55.3% of their weight sits in the same 46 holdings. JGRO also reports WDC, TSM, SNDK, which the other does not. OEF also reports JPM, ABBV, COST, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between JGRO and OEF measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 98% of JGRO and 100% of OEF, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, OEF or JGRO?
JGRO reports 127 stock positions and OEF reports 101. 33.3% of JGRO's weight sits in names OEF does not hold, and 19.5% of OEF's weight in names JGRO does not hold. The ten largest positions are 45.4% of JGRO and 52.8% of OEF.
How do JGRO and OEF differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: JGRO has 7.4 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.