MTUM vs SCHV overlap - what they share and where they differ
MTUM and SCHV share 36.3% of their weight across 90 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
MTUM and SCHV
36.3%
90 shared positions
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 125 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 41.5%·Holdings of MTUM
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 555 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 20.3%·Holdings of SCHV
Reported positions cover MTUM 100%, SCHV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
SCHV vs MTUM side by side
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
125
stock positions reported to the SEC
31.1% of its weight is in 35 names SCHV does not hold
SCHVSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
555
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.5% of its weight is in 465 names MTUM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: MTUM has 26.5 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| MTUM | SCHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 125 | 555 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 41.5% | 20.3% |
| Largest position | MU 5.9% | MU 3.5% |
| Held alone | 35 positions, 31.1% | 465 positions, 63.5% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In MTUM | In SCHV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.87% | 3.54% | 3.54% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION | 3.77% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.54% | 1.76% | 1.76% |
| INTCINTEL CORPORATION | 4.06% | 1.75% | 1.75% |
| WMTWALMART INC. | 2.64% | 1.65% | 1.65% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 2.55% | 1.54% | 1.54% |
| CATCATERPILLAR INC. | 3.65% | 1.32% | 1.32% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 3.09% | 1.29% | 1.29% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 3.10% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORPORATION | 1.75% | 1.11% | 1.11% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in MTUM
Only in SCHV
Questions people ask
Is MTUM the same as SCHV?
36.3% of their weight sits in the same 90 holdings. MTUM also reports AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, which the other does not. SCHV also reports BRK.A, JPM, ABBV, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between MTUM and SCHV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of MTUM and 100% of SCHV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, SCHV or MTUM?
MTUM reports 125 stock positions and SCHV reports 555. 31.1% of MTUM's weight sits in names SCHV does not hold, and 63.5% of SCHV's weight in names MTUM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 41.5% of MTUM and 20.3% of SCHV.
How do MTUM and SCHV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: MTUM has 26.5 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.