MTUM vs VONV overlap - what they share and where they differ
MTUM and VONV share 35.7% of their weight across 100 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
MTUM and VONV
35.7%
100 shared positions
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 125 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 41.5%·Holdings of MTUM
VONV
VANGUARD RUSSELL 1000 VALUE INDEX FUND
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 851 positions · May 31, 2026
Top 10: 22.1%·Holdings of VONV
Reported positions cover MTUM 100%, VONV 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
VONV vs MTUM side by side
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
125
stock positions reported to the SEC
21.8% of its weight is in 25 names VONV does not hold
VONVVANGUARD RUSSELL 1000 VALUE INDEX FUND
851
stock positions reported to the SEC
63.9% of its weight is in 751 names MTUM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: MTUM has 26.3 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| MTUM | VONV | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 125 | 851 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 41.5% | 22.1% |
| Largest position | MU 5.9% | GOOGL 4.2% |
| Held alone | 25 positions, 21.8% | 751 positions, 63.9% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In MTUM | In VONV | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 4.60% | 4.21% | 4.21% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.87% | 3.22% | 3.22% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION | 3.77% | 1.82% | 1.82% |
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.54% | 1.61% | 1.61% |
| INTCINTEL CORPORATION | 4.06% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 2.55% | 1.42% | 1.42% |
| WMTWALMART INC. | 2.64% | 1.35% | 1.35% |
| CATCATERPILLAR INC. | 3.65% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 5.11% | 1.02% | 1.02% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORPORATION | 1.75% | 1.02% | 1.02% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in MTUM
Only in VONV
Questions people ask
Is MTUM the same as VONV?
35.7% of their weight sits in the same 100 holdings. MTUM also reports AVGO, LRCX, GEV, which the other does not. VONV also reports BRK.A, JPM, AMZN, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between MTUM and VONV measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of MTUM and 100% of VONV, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, VONV or MTUM?
MTUM reports 125 stock positions and VONV reports 851. 21.8% of MTUM's weight sits in names VONV does not hold, and 63.9% of VONV's weight in names MTUM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 41.5% of MTUM and 22.1% of VONV.
How do MTUM and VONV differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: MTUM has 26.3 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.