MTUM vs XLK overlap - what they share and where they differ
MTUM and XLK share 40.9% of their weight across 28 common positions, read from what each fund reported to the SEC.
Each week Ploutos reads the reported positions of the largest US equity ETFs and measures, pair by pair, the weight they share: for every stock both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights counts. Two funds tracking the same index land near 100%. A sector fund inside a broad index fund lands at roughly that sector's weight.
MTUM and XLK
40.9%
28 shared positions
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 125 positions · Jul 31, 2026
Top 10: 41.5%·Holdings of MTUM
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Reported positions cover 100% of the fund, 74 positions · Jun 30, 2026
Top 10: 64.5%·Holdings of XLK
Reported positions cover MTUM 100%, XLK 100% of each fund. An overlap cannot exceed the smaller coverage, so a low figure can mean little overlap or thin reporting.
XLK vs MTUM side by side
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
125
stock positions reported to the SEC
55.2% of its weight is in 97 names XLK does not hold
XLKState Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
74
stock positions reported to the SEC
56.0% of its weight is in 46 names MTUM does not hold
Where each fund's weight sits
Largest sectors for both funds
The widest gap is Technology: XLK has 49.8 points more of it.
The figures side by side
| MTUM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 |
| Stock positions reported | 125 | 74 |
| Weight of the ten largest | 41.5% | 64.5% |
| Largest position | MU 5.9% | NVDA 14.7% |
| Held alone | 97 positions, 55.2% | 46 positions, 56.0% |
| Covered by stock positions | 100% | 100% |
Holdings they share
| Stock | In MTUM | In XLK | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.87% | 5.42% | 5.42% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 5.11% | 5.28% | 5.11% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 4.72% | 5.41% | 4.72% |
| INTCINTEL CORPORATION | 4.06% | 3.68% | 3.68% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 3.10% | 3.20% | 3.10% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 3.09% | 3.02% | 3.02% |
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.55% |
| KLACKLA CORPORATION | 1.53% | 2.20% | 1.53% |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED | 1.87% | 1.51% | 1.51% |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION | 2.23% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
What each holds alone
The heaviest positions one fund reports and the other does not.
Only in MTUM
Only in XLK
Questions people ask
Is MTUM the same as XLK?
40.9% of their weight sits in the same 28 holdings. MTUM also reports GOOGL, XOM, CAT, which the other does not. XLK also reports NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, which the other does not.
How is the overlap between MTUM and XLK measured?
For every stock both funds report, the smaller of the two weights counts, and the sum is the overlap. The reported positions cover 100% of MTUM and 100% of XLK, so the number cannot exceed the smaller coverage.
Which holds more, XLK or MTUM?
MTUM reports 125 stock positions and XLK reports 74. 55.2% of MTUM's weight sits in names XLK does not hold, and 56.0% of XLK's weight in names MTUM does not hold. The ten largest positions are 41.5% of MTUM and 64.5% of XLK.
How do MTUM and XLK differ by sector?
The widest gap is Technology: XLK has 49.8 points more of it. Sectors come from each holding's SIC code in its SEC record, summed by the weight the fund reports.
Where do the numbers come from?
From each fund's own N-PORT filing to the SEC, which lists every position and its weight. The comparison uses every equity position the fund reports; cash, futures and bonds are not counted, which is why a coverage figure sits next to every result. Holdings change between filings.
Add a third fund in the tool·All fund pairs
Descriptive data from public SEC filings. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any fund or stock, and holdings change between filings.